Students should be given guidance and stimulation in the instruction to be able to develop knowledge accordingly to the aims of the education. The history instruction should consider students’ different needs and abilities. If the guidance and stimulation is not sufficient, the teacher must form additional adjustments.
The purpose of this study is therefore to investigate how teachers in grade 4-6 make use of and develop additional adjustments in history instruction to meet students' differences. Since teachers reasoning, experiences and descriptions of additional adjustments are interesting to investigate, a qualitative method has been chosen and five teachers in grade 4 to 6 have participated in the study. The purpose of the study has been answered by how teachers apply additional adjustments in history instruction and how they collaborate when forming these adjustments. Furthermore, it describes how teachers follow up and evaluate the additional adjustments to develop their history instruction.
This interview study has its point of departure in the relational perspective and the communicative relational perspective (KoRP). Therefore, the analysis and the interpretation of the collected empirical evidence have been reviewed with a special education point of view. The result shows that the differences between guidance and stimulation, additional adjustments and special support need to be distinguished. It also discloses that teachers’ attitudes towards additional adjustments affects how the adjustments are formed but also what quality they have. A conclusion that is drawn is that guidance from special educators is important if teachers should be able to form adequate additional adjustments. It is also important that there are clear routines of how this work should be followed up and evaluated.