Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Structuring for Sustainability: An Exploratory Study on the Implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and its Implications for Organizational Structure
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School.
2024 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Sustainable development
Sustainable Development
Abstract [en]

Background: In an evolving business landscape, the need for regulations has emerged to foster sustainable business. To ensure that firms are held accountable, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) entered into force in January 2024, encompassing approximately 50,000 firms across Europe. This directive expands upon previous legislation in all conceivable metrics, and has put affected firms under significant pressure, posing implications for organizational change arising from the extensive implementation.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify what actions firms are taking to comply with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and explore how their actions impact their organizational structure.

Method: The study was conducted through a qualitative method including semi-structured interviews with eight participants, including HR Managers, Sustainability Managers, and Consultants.

Conclusion: The study reveals that the effects on the organizational structure of firms as a consequence of the CSRD primarily involves incremental change. Efforts of coordinating across departments, allocating tasks and establishing supervisory functions emerges as core challenges when transitioning to CSRD compliance. These, in turn constituting structural changes in specialization, functional flexibility, formalization and standardization to accommodate new procedures necessitated by the CSRD. The analysis further highlights the expansion of middle management, support staff and technostructure, as a result of organization wide collaboration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. , p. 80
Keywords [en]
sustainability reporting, corporate sustainability reporting directive, csrd, organizational structure, organizational change
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-64526OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-64526DiVA, id: diva2:1863799
Subject / course
JIBS, Business Administration
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2024-06-17 Created: 2024-05-31 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1239 kB)386 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1239 kBChecksum SHA-512
ca5b11b8ef2529707d53c9cb5eef947aa118c506e197ef356c718f021f56da804d48ada6077e90635d5973e7bd85a1786779042e0578a8b2341d9cc68ef96e85
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Jönköping International Business School
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 387 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 800 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf