Change search
Refine search result
1 - 2 of 2
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Nordén, Anna
    et al.
    Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    Coria, Jessica
    Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    Jönsson, Anna Maria
    Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    Lagergren, Fredrik
    Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    Lehsten, Veiko
    Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    Divergence in stakeholders' preferences: Evidence from a choice experiment on forest landscapes preferences in Sweden2017In: Ecological Economics, ISSN 0921-8009, E-ISSN 1873-6106, Vol. 132, p. 179-195Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    A great deal of biodiversity can be found in private forests, and protecting it requires taking into consideration the preferences of key stakeholders. In this study, we examine divergence in stakeholders' preferences for forest attributes across the general public, private non-industrial forest owners and public and private forest officials in Sweden by conducting a discrete choice experiment. Our results indicate that citizens have a positive valuation of biodiversity protection. Moreover, their valuation is statistically significantly higher than those of forest owners. Interestingly, our results suggest that both forest owners and forest officials have a strong orientation towards production, with higher valuation than the general public of the common management practice of even aged stands and clear felling. Even though the Swedish Forestry Act regards production and environmental goals as equally important, we find that forest officials prefer management practices that promote production rather than biodiversity protection. 

  • 2.
    Saari, Ulla A.
    et al.
    Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Management & Business, Tampere University, PO Box 541, Tampere, FI-33101, Finland.
    Damberg, S.
    Institute of Human Resource Management and Organizations (W-9), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 4 (D), Hamburg, 21073, Germany.
    Frömbling, L.
    Institute of Human Resource Management and Organizations (W-9), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 4 (D), Hamburg, 21073, Germany.
    Ringle, C. M.
    Institute of Human Resource Management and Organizations (W-9), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 4 (D), Hamburg, 21073, Germany.
    Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention2021In: Ecological Economics, ISSN 0921-8009, E-ISSN 1873-6106, Vol. 189, article id 107155Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This study explores how environmental knowledge and risk perception influence individuals' sustainable consumption behavior through the mediation of environmental concern and behavioral intention. The study combines constructs from earlier studies to form a novel theoretical model, which is tested and validated with an open data set from the Environment III 2010 module, which was collected by the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP). Our sample consists of respondents from nine countries (N = 11,675) in the European Union (EU) and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). The model indicates that environmental risk perception and environmental knowledge impact environmental concern significantly. Furthermore, environmental concern strongly influences behavioral intention, and these constructs, in turn, act as mediators of sustainable consumption behavior. The findings indicate that in Europe, sustainable consumption behavior can be associated with environmental concern, which is influenced by increased levels of environmental knowledge and environmental risk perception. The results provide a basis for future analyses once the Environment IV module is released. This will be of particular importance for tracking possible changes in the sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans when transitioning to a green and circular economy that is driven by the European Green Deal and EU Circular Economy Action Plan.

1 - 2 of 2
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf