Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Visual search strategies of pedestrians with and without visual and cognitive impairments in a shared zone: A proof of concept study
Curtin University.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. CHILD. Curtin University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0756-6862
Curtin University.
Chalmers University of Technology.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Land use policy, ISSN 0264-8377, E-ISSN 1873-5754, Vol. 57, 327-334 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Shared zones have gained increasing popularity in urban land use and design as a means of incorporating the needs of multiple modes of transport, while at the same time promoting social interaction between users. Interactions within shared zones are based on a set of informal social protocols, communicated via eye contact and social cues. This proof of concept study utilised eye-tracking technology to examine the visual search strategies of individuals, with and without visual and cognitive impairments as they navigated a strategically chosen shared zone. In total 3960 fixations were analysed and the fixations were distributed across the shared zone and a pedestrian crossing. Those with impairments were more likely to fixate on traffic specific areas and objects compared to those without, suggesting that they required more input ascertaining when and where it was safe to perform tasks. However, the duration of fixation was not significantly different for an object whether it was traffic related or not, indicating a global need for increased processing time of the surrounding environment. Shared zones are claimed to increase driver awareness and safety and reduce congestion, but the implications on participation and safety for those with visual and cognitive impairments is yet to be extensively explored.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 57, 327-334 p.
Keyword [en]
Autism, Eye tracking, Hemianopia, Intellectual impairment, Pedestrian
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Human Computer Interaction
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-31502DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.009ISI: 000382341200029ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84973861937Local ID: HHJChildISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-31502DiVA: diva2:955266
Available from: 2016-08-25 Created: 2016-08-25 Last updated: 2017-01-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkmer, Torbjörn
By organisation
HHJ. CHILDHLK, CHILD
In the same journal
Land use policy
Medical and Health SciencesHuman Computer Interaction

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf