Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Delphi study of occurring information in housing adaptation certificates
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Rehabilitation.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Rehabilitation. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. ADULT.
2016 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, ISSN 1103-8128, E-ISSN 1651-2014, Vol. 23, no 5, p. 357-365Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Background: Since 1993, the Housing Adaptation Act has provided disabled people the opportunity to receive grants for adapting their homes. A housing adaptation certificate certifying the necessity of adaptations must accompany any application and if information in housing adaptation certificates is not sufficient, the applicant is risking not having necessary housing adaptations.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and describe what information is missing, unnecessary or vague, in the housing adaptation certificates; to determine how often this occur, and how problematic this can be for the decision process.

Material and methods: 105 housing adaptation grant managers took part in a three-round Delphi survey.

Results: At least 65% consensus was reached regarding the following six statements: missing information about disability duration, possession of relevant assistive devices, consequences of the disability in housing, prognosis of consequences, who the informant is, or contains preferences for specific solutions. Missing, unnecessary or vague information pose serious or less serious problems and 38–72% of the participants reported that this often or always occur.

Conclusion: Housing adaptation certificates need to be improved.

Significance: The results of this study are used to design a checklist for use by housing adaptation certificate writers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2016. Vol. 23, no 5, p. 357-365
Keywords [en]
Consensus, Delphi technique, disability evaluation, expert testimony, occupational therapy
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-31451DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2016.1177591ISI: 000382173600004PubMedID: 27141923Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84965058516OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-31451DiVA, id: diva2:955120
Available from: 2016-08-24 Created: 2016-08-24 Last updated: 2018-02-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Björklund, Anita

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Björklund, Anita
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of RehabilitationHHJ. ADULT
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 208 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf