Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A new approach to estimation of the R&D–innovation–productivity relationship
Department of Economics, Boston College and Department of Macroeconomics, DIW Berlin, Germany.
Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden .
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5776-9396
2017 (English)In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, ISSN 1043-8599, E-ISSN 1476-8364, Vol. 26, no 1-2, p. 121-133Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

We apply a generalized structural equation model approach to the estimation of the relationship between R&D, innovation and productivity that focuses on the potentially crucial heterogeneity across sectors. The model accounts for selectivity and handles the endogeneity of this relationship in a recursive framework which allows for feedback effects from productivity to future R&D investment. Our approach enables the estimation of the different equations as one system, allowing the coefficients to differ across sectors, and also permits us to take cross-equation correlation of the errors into account. Employing a panel of Swedish manufacturing and service firms observed in three consecutive Community Innovation Surveys in the period 2008–2012, our full-information maximum likelihood estimates show that many key channels of influence among the model's components vary meaningfully in their statistical significance and magnitude across six different sectors based on the OECD classification on technological and knowledge intensity. These results cast doubt on earlier research which does not allow for sectoral heterogeneity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2017. Vol. 26, no 1-2, p. 121-133
Keywords [en]
community innovation survey, generalized structural equation model, innovation, productivity, R&D
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-31225DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2016.1202515ISI: 000410576900009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84978476682Local ID: ;intsam;952010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-31225DiVA, id: diva2:952010
Available from: 2016-08-11 Created: 2016-08-11 Last updated: 2021-03-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Stephan, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stephan, Andreas
By organisation
JIBS, EconomicsJIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO)
In the same journal
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 463 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf