Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Entrepreneurial opportunities as propensities: Do Ramoglou & Tsang move the field forward?
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6363-1382
2017 (English)In: Journal of Business Venturing Insights, ISSN 2352-6734, Vol. 7, p. 82-85Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Ramoglou & Tsang's (R&T) article “A realist perspective of entrepreneurship: Opportunities as propensities” is a recent, potentially influential addition to the literature on “entrepreneurial opportunities”. This short communication argues that R&T's intellectual exercise largely fails to move matters forward on the two most central problems with prior research on “entrepreneurial opportunities”, namely 1) lack of construct clarity and 2) slow progress regarding how characteristics of “entrepreneurial opportunities” give shape to entrepreneurial action and outcomes. I suggest that entrepreneurship researchers should avoid the detour of conceptually dichotomizing complex and empirically non-tractable sets of external circumstances into “opportunities” vs. “non-opportunities” and instead direct attention to multi-dimensional and continuous variation in “those [evolving] entities which entrepreneurs actually evaluate and [sometimes] act upon” (and which should not be mislabeled as “opportunities”). For this endeavor, the notion of “agency-intensity” is the primary take-away from R&T's study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017. Vol. 7, p. 82-85
Keywords [en]
Opportunity; New venture idea; Construct clarity; Research implications; Realism
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-29810DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.02.002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84975478907OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-29810DiVA, id: diva2:922055
Available from: 2016-04-21 Created: 2016-04-21 Last updated: 2017-12-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Davidsson, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Davidsson, Per
By organisation
JIBS, Business Administration
In the same journal
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 108 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf