Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Similarities and differences between TQM, six sigma and lean
School of Engineering, University College of Borås.
School of Engineering, University College of Borås.
School of Engineering, University College of Borås.
2006 (English)In: TQM Magazine, ISSN 0954-478X, E-ISSN 1758-6887, Vol. 18, no 3, 282-296 p.Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Purpose – During the last decades, different quality management concepts, including total quality management (TQM), six sigma and lean, have been applied by many different organisations. Although much important work has been documented regarding TQM, six sigma and lean, a number of questions remain concerning the applicability of these concepts in various organisations and contexts. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to describe the similarities and differences between the concepts, including an evaluation and criticism of each concept.

Design/methodology/approach – Within a case study, a literature review and face‐to‐face interviews in typical TQM, six sigma and lean organisations have been carried out.

Findings – While TQM, six sigma and lean have many similarities, especially concerning origin, methodologies, tools and effects, they differ in some areas, in particular concerning the main theory, approach and the main criticism. The lean concept is slightly different from TQM and six sigma. However, there is a lot to gain if organisations are able to combine these three concepts, as they are complementary. Six sigma and lean are excellent road‐maps, which could be used one by one or combined, together with the values in TQM.

Originality/value – The paper provides guidance to organisations regarding the applicability and properties of quality concepts. Organisations need to work continuously with customer‐orientated activities in order to survive; irrespective of how these activities are labelled. The paper will also serve as a basis for further research in this area, focusing on practical experience of these concepts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 18, no 3, 282-296 p.
Keyword [en]
Quality management, Six sigma, Total quality management, Lean production, Quality improvement
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-29679DOI: 10.1108/09544780610660004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33646888198OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-29679DiVA: diva2:915119
Note

Special Issue: Consistency and Transformation in the Quality Movement

Available from: 2015-11-13 Created: 2016-03-29 Last updated: 2016-03-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Roy
In the same journal
TQM Magazine
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf