Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Learning from a successful Quality ImprovementCollaborative. Why did it work? – Experience from teams and team coacheswho improved their care for children with diabetes
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Quality Improvement and Leadership in Health and Welfare.
Show others and affiliations
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-28320OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-28320DiVA: diva2:871664
Available from: 2015-11-16 Created: 2015-11-16 Last updated: 2015-11-16
In thesis
1. Learning and understanding for quality improvement under different conditions: An analysis of quality registry-based collaboratives in acute and chronic care
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Learning and understanding for quality improvement under different conditions: An analysis of quality registry-based collaboratives in acute and chronic care
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The demands that are placed on healthcare systems continue to increase, but several studies show that patient care and healthcare system outcomes are not as good as they could be. To come to terms with these problems, many stakeholders turn to systematic quality improvement methods. However, research and practice also shows that change in organisations is difficult. Consequently many quality improvement projects fail. Quality Improvement Collaboratives (QICs), introduced through the use of the Breakthrough series model, represent a commonly used approach. Despite their widespread application, uncertainty remains regarding the effectiveness of QICs. In Sweden, a number of national quality registries document healthcare actions and outcomes for different patient-groups and problem-areas. While these registries have long been used for follow-up purposes and for clinical research, they have not been used extensively for systematic clinical improvement purposes. The overall aim of this thesis was to examine if, and how, QICs which are supported by national quality registries can contribute to quality improvement in the provision of healthcare. The aim was also to examine what learning and new understanding occurred in the application of QICs in different settings.

The empirical material in this thesis comes from three QICs which included participating teams from different hospitals and health centres in Sweden. Each QIC included a national quality registry: the National Quality Registry for Acute Myocardial Infarction Care (RIKS-HIA); the National Diabetes Registry (NDR); and the Swedish Paediatric Diabetes Quality Registry (SWEDIABKIDS).

The thesis draws on an interactive research approach. The data collection and analysis employed both qualitative and quantitative methods. Data fromthe National Quality Registries, final team reports, focus-group interviews, and team members’ experiences were analysed and triangulated.

The studies shows that QICs which are supported by national quality registries helped teams to close a number of gaps between ordinary clinical practice and evidence-based guidelines, thereby contributing to the provision of better care and better clinical outcomes (Study I, Study II, and Study III). Important factors for success included stakeholders’ learning andunderstanding of the organisational context; structures that supported improvement efforts; and team members’ and managers’ commitment to improvement (Study IV). Furthermore, support by an internal team coach also promoted success (Study IV).

This thesis shows how national quality registries can be used in combination with systematic improvement efforts to produce better clinical results. It concludes that different areas of QIC application pose different challenges; for example, addressing care for acute disease versus chronic disease and evaluating professionally influenced process measures versus patient dependent outcome measures. While different organizational contexts and care characteristics can pose challenges to QIC efforts, the formation of “Communities of Practice” during QICs enhanced the learning for improvement with and from others.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Jönköping: Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, 2015. 123 p.
Series
Hälsohögskolans avhandlingsserie, ISSN 1654-3602 ; 65
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-28322 (URN)978-91-85835-64-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-12-18, Originalet, Qulturum, Region Jönköpings län, Jönköping, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-11-16 Created: 2015-11-16 Last updated: 2015-11-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Peterson, AnetteAndersson Gäre, BoelHedberg, BeritThor, Johan
By organisation
HHJ, Quality Improvement and Leadership in Health and WelfareThe Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 234 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf