Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Family ownership and R&D intensity in small- and medium-sized firms
IULM University, Milano, Italy.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Center for Family Enterprise and Ownership (CeFEO).
IULM University, Milano, Italy.
Centre for Family Business, Institute for Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development, Lancaster University Management School, United Kingdom.
2015 (English)In: The Journal of product innovation management, ISSN 0737-6782, E-ISSN 1540-5885, Vol. 32, no 3, 349-360 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research was largely consistent in predicting a negative relationship between family ownership and research and development (R&D) intensity until Chrisman and Patel, using a behavioral agency model (BAM), called this general assumption into question. They argued that publicly owned family firms typically invest less in R&D than nonfamily-owned firms. This behavior may however be reversed if economic performance levels are below family aspirations or if family long-term goals, such as pursuing strong transgenerational family control, are highly valued. While most researchers, like Chrisman and Patel, primarily focused on large listed firms, more research on the relationship between family ownership and R&D intensity in privately held small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is required. This is because firm size can play an important role in understanding the innovation management behavior of firms. Building on the BAM perspective, in the present paper it is argued that Chrisman and Patel's results can be extended to the context of SMEs, albeit with one important specification: the relationship between family ownership and R&D intensity is likely to be contingent on the way the family has invested its wealth. Specifically, it is contended that in the context of SMEs, where goals are more fluid and mixed, when there is a high overlap between family wealth and firm equity (i.e., most of the family's wealth is invested in the firm) the relationship between family ownership and R&D intensity is negative because of the family owners' greater desire to protect their socioemotional wealth (SEW). However, if the overlap between the family's total wealth and single firm equity is low (i.e., firm equity is just a small part of the total family wealth), the relationship between family ownership and R&D intensity is positive as the low overlap between family wealth and firm equity reduces the family's loss aversion propensity. In such a situation, family ownership is likely to foster R&D intensity because of the long-term orientation of family owners that increases the family firm's propensity to bear the risk of investing in R&D activities. The hypothesis is tested and confirmed in a study of 240 small- and medium-sized firms based in Italy. The paper contributes to the literature in several ways. First, adding to the literature on innovation management and R&D intensity, it increases the understanding of what drives or inhibits R&D investments in SMEs when a family is involved in the ownership of the firm. This is particularly important because research on innovation management, as well as research on R&D intensity in family firms, is primarily focused on large firms and much less on SMEs. Second, the study complements arguments from prior research on the correlates of R&D intensity in large listed firms, showing that the BAM and SEW perspective offer a theoretical framework that is also able to illustrate the complex nature of innovation management in the context of SMEs. Third, the study contributes to research on the effects of family ownership on the general functioning of a firm. In particular, it provides new insights into how family ownership may affect R&D intensity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 32, no 3, 349-360 p.
Keyword [en]
Economic performance, Innovation management, Long-term goals, Long-term orientation, Research and development, Small and medium sized firms, Small and medium-sized enterprise, Theoretical framework
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-28258ISI: 000352636400004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84926420384Local ID: IHHCeFEOISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-28258DiVA: diva2:866805
Available from: 2015-11-03 Created: 2015-11-03 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(454 kB)164 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 454 kBChecksum SHA-512
f929dde53f7ddd15d0a2e49024285419ec2aa2019a1d1db43716c78bfa829e6b51689c815f6b0087bf8e882f18d8e0ae3cc7b0b6c8c954d8e5866cf310fbc19f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Scopus

Authority records BETA

Nordqvist, Mattias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordqvist, Mattias
By organisation
JIBS, Center for Family Enterprise and Ownership (CeFEO)
In the same journal
The Journal of product innovation management
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 164 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1275 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf