Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Two Different Strategies to Facilitate Involvement in Healthcare Improvements: A Swedish County Council Initiative
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Quality Improvement and Leadership in Health and Welfare.
Malmö Högskola.
Röda Korsets högskola, Stockholm.
Linköpings Universitet.
2014 (English)In: Global Advances in Health and Medicine, ISSN 2164-957X, E-ISSN 2164-9561, Vol. 3, no 5, 22-28 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: From a management point of view, there are many different approaches from which to choose to engage staff members in initiatives to improve performance.

Objective: The present study evaluated how two different types of improvement strategies facilitate and encourage involvement of different professional groups in health-care organizations.

Methods/Design: Empirical data of two different types of strategies were collected within an improvement project in a County Council in Sweden. The data analysis was carried out through classifying the participants' profession, position, gender, and the organizational administration of which they were a part, in relation to their participation.

Setting: An improvement project in a County Council in Sweden.

Participants: Designed Improvement Processes consisted of n=105 teams and Intrapreneurship Projects of n=202 projects.

Intervention: Two different types of improvement strategies, Designed Improvement Processes and Intrapreneurship Projects.

Main Outcome Measures: How two different types of improvement strategies facilitate and encourage involvement of different professional groups in healthcare organizations.

Results: Nurses were the largest group participating in both improvement initiatives. Physicians were also well represented, although they seemed to prefer the less structured Intrapreneurship Projects approach. Assistant nurses, being the second largest staff group, were poorly represented in both initiatives. This indicates that the benefits and support for one group may push another group aside.

Conclusions: Managers need to give prerequisites and incentives for staff who do not participate in improvements to do so. Comparisons of different types of improvement initiatives are an underused research strategy that yields interesting and thoughtful results.

Read More: http://www.gahmj.com/doi/abs/10.7453/gahmj.2014.040

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 3, no 5, 22-28 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-24774DOI: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.040PubMedID: 25568821OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-24774DiVA: diva2:748410
Available from: 2014-09-19 Created: 2014-09-19 Last updated: 2017-04-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedFulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Ann-ChristineElg, Mattias
By organisation
HHJ, Quality Improvement and Leadership in Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Global Advances in Health and Medicine
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 199 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf