Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic for monitoring biological therapy
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Nursing Science. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. ADULT.
Research and Development Centre, Spenshult Hospital, Oskarström, Sweden.
Spenshult Hospital for Rheumatic diseases, Spenshult Hospital, Oskarström, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, ISSN 0309-2402, E-ISSN 1365-2648, Vol. 70, no 1, 164-175 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim

To compare and evaluate the treatment outcomes of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic and a rheumatologist-led clinic in patients with low disease activity or in remission who are undergoing biological therapy.

Background

Patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis treated with biological therapy are usually monitored by rheumatologists. Nurse-led rheumatology clinics have been proposed in patients with low disease activity or in remission.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Methods

A 12-month follow-up trial was conducted between October 2009 and August 2011, where 107 patients were randomized into two groups with a 6-month follow-up to a nurse-led rheumatology clinic based on person-centred care (intervention group; = 53) or to a rheumatologist-led clinic (control group; = 54). The hypothesis was that the nurse-led clinic outcomes would not be inferior to those obtained from a rheumatologist-led clinic at the 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome was disease activity measured by Disease Activity Score 28.

Results

A total of 47 patients in the intervention group and 50 in the control group completed the 12-month trial. The trial revealed no statistically significant differences between groups in mean change of Disease Activity Score 28, Visual Analogue Scales for pain, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, satisfaction with or confidence in obtaining rheumatology care.

Conclusion

Patients with stable chronic inflammatory arthritis undergoing biological therapy could be monitored by a nurse-led rheumatology clinic without difference in outcome as measured by the Disease Activity Score 28.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 70, no 1, 164-175 p.
Keyword [en]
biological therapy, intervention, nurse-led rheumatology clinic, person-centred care, randomized controlled trial
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-22673DOI: 10.1111/jan.12183ISI: 000327900300017PubMedID: 23772698Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84889655639OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-22673DiVA: diva2:678605
Available from: 2013-12-12 Created: 2013-12-12 Last updated: 2016-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fridlund, Bengt
By organisation
School of Health and WelfareHHJ, Dep. of Nursing ScienceHHJ. ADULT
In the same journal
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 248 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf