Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adapting to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve: a phenomenographic study
Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jönköping University, School of Health Science, HHJ, Dep. of Nursing Science. Jönköping University, School of Health Science, HHJ. ADULT.
Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, ISSN 0309-2402, E-ISSN 1365-2648, Vol. 69, no 9, 2088-2098 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim

To describe how patients adapt to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve.

Background

Aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis is preferred for patients with life expectancy of more than 10 years as they are more durable than bioprosthetic valves. Mechanical valves have some disadvantages, such as higher risk of thrombosis and embolism, increased risk of bleeding related to lifelong oral anticoagulation treatment and noise from the valve.

Design

An explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was employed.

Methods

An explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was applied. Interviews were conducted over 4 months during 2010–2011 with 20 strategically sampled patients, aged 24–74 years having undergone aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis during the last 10 years.

Findings

Patients adapted to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve in four ways: ‘The competent patient’ wanted to stay in control of his/her life. ‘The adjusted patient’ considered the implications of having a mechanical aortic valve as part of his/her daily life. ‘The unaware patient’ was not aware of warfarin–diet–medication interactions. ‘The worried patient’ was bothered with the oral anticoagulation and annoyed by the sound of the valve. Patients moved between the different ways of adapting.

Conclusions

The oral anticoagulation therapy was considered the most troublesome consequence, but also the sound of the valve was difficult to accept. Patient counselling and adequate follow-up can make patients with mechanical aortic heart valves more confident and competent to manage their own health. We recommend that patients should participate in a rehabilitation programme following cardiac surgery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 69, no 9, 2088-2098 p.
Keyword [en]
adaptation, aortic stenosis, cardiac nursing, mechanical prosthesis, phenomenographic analysis, qualitative method
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-22670DOI: 10.1111/jan.12076Local ID: HHJADULTISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-22670DiVA: diva2:678591
Available from: 2013-12-12 Created: 2013-12-12 Last updated: 2013-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fridlund, Bengt
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Nursing ScienceHHJ. ADULT
In the same journal
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 231 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf