Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Registered nurses' view of pain assessment among persons with dementia as consultant advisors
Jönköping University, School of Health Science, HHJ, Dep. of Nursing Science.
Jönköping University, School of Health Science, HHJ, Dep. of Nursing Science.
Institutionen för vård och natur, Högskolan i Skövde.
Jönköping University, School of Health Science, HHJ, Institute of Gerontology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4149-9787
2012 (English)In: Open Nursing Journal, ISSN 1874-4346, E-ISSN 1874-4346, no 6, p. 62-70Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Pain assessment in persons with dementia is well known as a challenging issue to professionalcaregivers, because of these patients´ difficulties in verbalising pain problems. Within municipal dementia care inSweden, pain assessment has become problematic for registered nurses, as they have entered a new role in their nursingprofession, from being clinical practitioners to becoming consultant advisers to other health care staff.

Aim: To present municipal registered nurses´ view of pain assessment in personswith dementia in relation to their nursingprofession as consultant advisers.

Methods: Purposive sampling was undertaken with 11 nurses invited to participate. Data were collected by focus groups.Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the data.

Findings: Four categories were identified to describe registered nurses´ view of pain assessment: estrangement frompractical nursing care, time consuming and unsafe pain documentation, unfulfilled needs of reflection possibilities, andcollaboration and coordination.

Conclusions: The performance of pain assessment through a consultant advising function is experienced as frustrating andas an uncomfortable nursing situation. The nurses feel resistance to providing nursing in this way. They view nursing as aclinical task demanding daily presence among patients to enable them to make accurate and safe assessments. However,due to the consultative model, setting aside enough time for the presence seems difficult to accomplish. It is necessary topromote the quality of systematic routines in pain assessment and reflection, as well as developing professionalknowledge of how pain can be expressed by dementia patients, especially those with communication difficulties.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. no 6, p. 62-70
Keywords [en]
dementia care, pain assessment, registered nurses
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-20445DOI: 10.2174/1874434601206010062OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-20445DiVA, id: diva2:600511
Available from: 2013-01-24 Created: 2013-01-24 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Detection and assessment of pain in dementia care practice: Registered nurses’ and certified nursing assistants’ experiences
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Detection and assessment of pain in dementia care practice: Registered nurses’ and certified nursing assistants’ experiences
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Aim: The overall aim of the thesis was to explore and describe registered nurses’ (RNs) and certified nursing assistants’ (CNAs) experiences of detection and assessment of pain in older people with cognitive impairment and dementia. A further aim was to evaluate the Abbey Pain Scale-SWE (APS-SWE) in dementia care practice.

Methods: An exploratory and descriptive design was used in Study I. An exploratory and interpreting design was used in Study II and Study III. A prospective, descriptive, observational and instrumental design was used in Study IV. Focus group interviews (I) and individual interviews (II, III) were applied to explore and describe RNs’ and CNAs’ experiences of pain assessment in people living with dementia. Qualitative content analysis (I) and philosophical hermeneutics (II) were used to analyse qualitative data. Observation, instrument, and questionnaire were applied to evaluate reliability and face validity of the APS-SWE for pain assessment. Descriptive statistics and reliability analyses were used to analyse quantitative data (IV).

Results: RNs in special housing accommodation settings experiences that pain assessment in people with dementia is challenging primarily due to their changed RN consultant role, which to a great extent is directed into administrative and consultative tasks rather than bedside care. This has led to decreased time in daily nursing care, preventing recognising symptoms of pain. This have also led to that RNs are dependent on information from CNAs who are the front-line staff providing daily care (I). CNAs’ perception of signs of pain in people with dementia emerges from being present in the care situation and alertness on physical and behavioural changes that could be due to pain, and from providing the care in a preventive, protective and supportive way to prevent painful situations occurring (II). RNs and CNAs working in home healthcare team use a variety of strategies to detect and assess pain. A trustful work relationship based on staff continuity and a good relation to the person in need of care facilitates pain assessment situations (III). Systematic observation of older people living in special housing accommodation during rest and mobility using the APS-SWE demonstrates that the scale has adequate internal consistency, reliability, and face validity for pain assessment (IV).

Conclusions: This thesis found that the RNs’ and CNAs’ detections and assessments of pain rely on solid cooperation, staff continuity, and good knowledge of the person cared for. It was also revealed that there is a lack of using appropriate and assisting pain tools. The APS-SWE show adequate reliability and face validity and can serve as a useful pain tool to assist in detection and assessment of pain in older people who are limited in verbalising pain recognisable. Further evaluation of how the person-centred perspective is applied in pain assessment situations is needed in order to evaluate positive outcomes in people with dementia. Further psychometric evaluation of the APS-SWE in clinical dementia care practice is needed to strengthen validity and reliability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Jönköping: Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, 2015. p. 116
Series
Hälsohögskolans avhandlingsserie, ISSN 1654-3602 ; 62
Keywords
Abbey Pain Scale-SWE, cognitive impairment, dementia, municipal elderly care, observational behavioural pain assessment scales, pain assessment, person-centred care
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-28113 (URN)978-91-85835-61-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-10-23, Forum Humanum, Hälsohögskolan i Jönköping, Jönköping, 10:38 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-10-07 Created: 2015-10-07 Last updated: 2015-10-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Karlsson, ChristinaErnsth Bravell, Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, ChristinaErnsth Bravell, Marie
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Nursing ScienceHHJ, Institute of Gerontology
In the same journal
Open Nursing Journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 372 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf