Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Testing for unit roots in panel data using a wavelet ratio method
Center for Labor Market Policy Research (CAFO), Department of Economic and Statistics, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics, Finance and Statistics. (Statistics)
2013 (English)In: Computational Economics, ISSN 0927-7099, E-ISSN 1572-9974, Vol. 41, no 1, 59-69 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

For testing unit root in single time series, most tests concentrate on the time domain. Recently, Fan and Gençay (Econom Theory 26:1305–1331, 2010) proposed a wavelet ratio test which took advantage of the information from the frequency domain by using a wavelet spectrum methodology. This test shows a better power than many time domain based unit root tests including the Dickey–Fuller (J Am Stat Assoc74:427–431, 1979) type of test in the univariate time series case. On the other hand, various unit root tests in multivariate time series have appeared since the pioneering work of Levin and Lin (Unit root test in panel data: new results, University of California at San Diego, Discussion Paper, 1993). Among them, the Im–Pesaran–Shin (IPS) (J Econ 115(1):53–74, 1997) test is widely used for its straightforward implementation and robustness to heterogeneity. The IPS test is a group mean test which uses the average of the test statistics for each single series. As the test statistics in each seriescan be flexible, this paper will apply the wavelet ratio statistic to give a comparison with the test by using Dickey–Fuller t statistic in the single series. Simulation results show a gain in power by employing the wavelet ratio test instead of the Dickey–Fullert statistic in the panel data case. As the IPS test is sensitive to cross sectional dependence, we further compare the robustness of both test statistics when there exists crosscorrectional dependence among the units in the panel data. Finally we apply a residual based wavestrapping methodology to reduce the over biased size problem brought up by the cross correlation for both test statistics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 41, no 1, 59-69 p.
Keyword [en]
Wavelet, Panel data, Unit root, Cross sectional dependence, Wavestrapping
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-17325DOI: 10.1007/s10614-011-9302-yOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-17325DiVA: diva2:480753
Available from: 2012-01-19 Created: 2012-01-19 Last updated: 2013-07-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Shukur, Ghazi
By organisation
JIBS, Economics, Finance and Statistics
In the same journal
Computational Economics
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 164 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf