Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Aim For The Stars: Is it worth paying higher fees for funds within the Morningstar RatingTM system
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Accounting and Finance.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Accounting and Finance.
2011 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Morningstar is an independent provider of investment research and provide information on approximately 380 000 investment offerings about mutual funds. Morningstar are most known for their “star” rating system, which rates funds from the lowest 1-star to the highest 5-stars.

Since investors frequently use fund data provided by Morningstar, we will evaluate whether investing in funds with higher fees and higher ratings would end up with higher returns. Examinations will be made if there is a relationship between mutual fund performance and the management fees within top-rated (5-star) funds and bottom-rated (1-&2-star).

The mutual funds which are included in this thesis are United Kingdom (UK) managed and invested in three different markets; Asia-Pacific except-Japan, Europe except UK-Large Cap, and the United States (US) Market. This allows us to compare different markets at different stages of maturity.

The results clearly show that the top-rated funds within all three markets outperformed the bottom-rated funds. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that the investor in general will earn a higher return by paying a higher management fee (TER) for the top-rated funds in all regions. The results also show that the TER for the bottom-rated funds in Europe and US market is higher compared to the top-rated funds. This means that the investor will pay higher fees for funds that do not perform well.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011.
Keyword [en]
Mutual Fund Performance, Morningstar Rating System, Total Expense Ratio, Risk-Adjusted Performance
National Category
Economics and Business Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-15803OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-15803DiVA: diva2:434448
Subject / course
IHH, Business Administration
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-08-17 Created: 2011-08-15 Last updated: 2011-08-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Aim for the Stars(1472 kB)326 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1472 kBChecksum SHA-512
a66b37c1308b02290f230ce3dc98d07bab2ac675d2b14552e4db683831437b4e786b070e4393d0e703b32bbe3f329f3c47dbd5128bbb626bffbe840981b6b317
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JIBS, Accounting and Finance
Economics and BusinessEconomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 326 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 303 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf