Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Corporate Opportunity: Förbudet för styrelseledamot och verkställande direktör att utnyttja affärsmöjlighet som faller inom bolagets verksamhetsområde
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Commercial Law.
2011 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The corporate opportunity doctrine constitutes a prohibition for the directors and officers of a company to pursue for themselves any opportunity which falls within the scope of the corporation’s business. In Swedish law the doctrine has not yet seemed to attract any greater attention. This doctrine has been the focus of a multitude of cases in a both American and English law, however mainly in the America law. Therefore, the American legal framework can serve as guidance in trying to define the doctrine as it has developed, or perhaps more correctly not developed, in national law.

The perhaps most crucial question to be answered in the area of corporate opportunities is how the law indentify an opportunity as a “corporate” one. This is done by an overall assessment of the opportunity. First there needs to be established weather there exist some tie between the opportunity and the scope of the corporation’s business. Secondly, if a tie exists, it has to be taken into account weather the corporation e.g. had an interest or expectancy in the opportunity, the financial ability to undertake the opportunity and the capacity in which the opportunity was presented to the director or officer.  

If the company rejects the opportunity or if the director or officer receives authorization from the company, the opportunity is available to exploitation of the director or officer.

A difference should be made between private and public companies, but not between full-time and part-time directors or officers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , p. 41
Keywords [sv]
Associationsrätt, bolagsrätt, lojalitetsplikt, corporate opportunity, styrelseledamot, verkställande direktör
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-15070OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-15070DiVA, id: diva2:418829
Subject / course
IHH, Commercial Law
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-06-28 Created: 2011-05-24 Last updated: 2011-06-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(567 kB)445 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 567 kBChecksum SHA-512
6c60d4d41d0568adbd11b751fa14560375ee84f325b40fb698b9690d624756d0be9d4bcd5732fc7e2a73e1dbe20854cc4a5f577e8eab8534c8a1727f67077f46
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JIBS, Commercial Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 445 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 443 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf