Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ethical aspects of judging the alternative treatment of children with cancer
Jönköping University, School of Health Science, HHJ, Dep. of Nursing Science. Jönköping University, School of Health Science, HHJ. CHILD. (Child-hälsa)
1995 (English)In: Nursing Ethics, ISSN 0969-7330, E-ISSN 1477-0989, Vol. 2, no 1, p. 51-62Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: To study quality of life and subjective post-concussion symptoms in adults (16-60 years) with a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) 3 months and 1 year after injury.

METHODS: Of a total of 489 patients 173 responded to questionnaires at 3 months and at 1 year, including the SF-36 health-related quality of life survey, which is a standardized measure validated for Swedish conditions. Post-concussion symptoms were rated as either existing or non-existing in a 21-item checklist [a modified version of Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS)].

RESULTS: SF-36 showed impaired scores in all dimensions. Existing post-concussion symptoms were reported by 1545%. Significantly, more symptoms were present at 3 months than at 3 weeks after injury. Furthermore, a significant correlation between higher rates of post-concussion symptoms and lower SF-36 scores was found. CONCLUSIONS:

The SF-36 results were significantly impaired compared with an age- and gender-matched normative control group and the rate of post-concussion symptoms was significantly higher at 3 months than at 3 weeks after injury. As a significant correlation between higher rates of symptoms and low SF-36 scores was also found we assume SF-36 to be a sensitive enough measure of MTBI-related effects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1995. Vol. 2, no 1, p. 51-62
Keyword [en]
Beneficence, Child, Child Advocacy, Complementary Therapies, Ethical Analysis, Ethical Theory, Ethics; Nursing, Female, Humans, Leukemia; Lymphocytic; Acute; L1/*therapy, Principle-Based Ethics, Resource Allocation, Risk Assessment, Social Responsibility, Stress; Psychological, Treatment Outcome
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-1708PubMedID: 7728556OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-1708DiVA, id: diva2:32528
Available from: 2008-07-09 Created: 2008-07-09 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

PubMedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=7728556&dopt=Citation

Authority records BETA

Enskär, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Enskär, Karin
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Nursing ScienceHHJ. CHILD
In the same journal
Nursing Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 255 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf