Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Position Paper No. 5: Empowerment and Participatory Health Research
Self-employed professional, Chapecó, Brazil.
University of New Mexico, New México, USA.
HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Catholic University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)Report (Other academic)
Sustainable development
00. Sustainable Development, 3. Good health and well-being, 10. Reduced inequalities
Abstract [en]

Empowerment has been a key conceptual underpinning of participatory health research (PHR), both as a set of processes that inform how partners and diverse stakeholders engage with each other, as well as a set of outcomes that contribute to improved health and social equity. The concept of empowerment is present in a number of characteristics of PHR as described in Position Paper No. 1 of the ICPHR (2013) entitled "What is participatory health research?", namely: PHR is a participatory and collective process: One of the goals of PHR is to promote the empowerment of the people involved so that all can actively participate in the process of knowledge production. With this approach, the results of the research can contribute to the improvement of the health and life of the people involved, and to the strengthening of personal and collective capacities.

PHR promotes critical reflexivity: Participatory research processes promote a better understanding and acceptance of differences, supporting the reflective capacity and dialogue between those involved. Critical reflexivity refers to ongoing critical reflection of how power or lack of power affects the daily life and practice of the people involved in the research. These dynamics also occur within the partnership itself which magnifies the importance of critical reflexivity to promote power sharing within and outside the partnership. PHR aims for transformation through the action of people: Participatory research in health seeks to produce social changes favorable to the lives of the people involved in the study. However, this approach understands that such changes can be more effective in the way that people assume an active role in the entire research process, thus experiencing a process of empowerment. People can claim their power or have their power expanded to act in favor of their own interests when they recognize issues that are meaningful to them and, through critical reflection, understand their causes and visualize opportunities for effective intervention, empowering themselves to act on the basis of this knowledge. PHR produces knowledge which is local, collective, co-created, dialogical and diverse: the shared production of knowledge -- know-how, insights, wisdom and practices -- that benefits all people and communities involved, ultimately supporting the new paradigm of knowledge democracy. One of the great benefits of PHR is that it can potentially provide a safe place for people to work together across sectors, disciplines, and hierarchies. Through research collaboration, people can claim their own power, their own knowledge, and their own agency for personal, organizational, community, policy, and political transformation. However, participation cannot be taken for granted, but requires a conscious collective effort to co-create equitable decision-making, equal production of knowledge from diverse stakeholders, and ultimately to engage in practices that share power and enable people who are in disadvantaged positions to act on and grow the power they have.

This position paper seeks to deepen our understanding of empowerment and the implications for conducting participatory health research with an underlying empowerment approach. We write for a wide audience of stakeholders interested in the benefits of PHR, including researchers, practitioners, policy makers, social entrepreneurs, social activists, funders, students, and anyone who wants to contribute to social justice and health equity. We first briefly present some history and definitions, then potential critiques of the use and understanding of the term empowerment. Finally, we will present reflections of how we can enhance our integration of empowerment into our participatory health research practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) , 2021. , p. 27
Series
ICPHR Position papers
Keywords [en]
Participatory Health Research, empowerment, participatory research methodology, ethics, social action
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-67448OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-67448DiVA, id: diva2:1946363
Note

Version: August 2021.

Available from: 2025-03-21 Created: 2025-03-21 Last updated: 2025-03-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Fulltext

Authority records

Avery, Helen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Avery, Helen
By organisation
HLK, Sustainable Societies (SUS)
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf