Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A scoping review of digital fabrication techniques applied to prosthetics and orthotics: Part 1 of 2-Prosthetics
Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub), London, UK; Institute of Making, University College London, London, UK; University College London Interaction Centre (UCLIC), London, UK.
Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub), London, UK; University College London Interaction Centre (UCLIC), London, UK.
Institute of Making, University College London, London, UK.
Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, ISSN 0309-3646, E-ISSN 1746-1553, Vol. 48, no 5, p. 574-589Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the manufacture of prostheses is time-consuming and labor-intensive. One possible route to improving access and quality of these devices is the digitalizing of the fabrication process, which may reduce the burden of manual labor and bring the potential for automation that could help unblock access to assistive technologies globally.

OBJECTIVES: To identify where there are gaps in the literature that are creating barriers to decision-making on either appropriate uptake by clinical teams or on the needed next steps in research that mean these technologies can continue on a pathway to maturity.

STUDY DESIGN: Scoping literature review.

METHODS: A comprehensive search was completed in the following databases: Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health Archive, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Association for Computing Machinery, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and Engineering Village, resulting in 3487 articles to be screened.

RESULTS: After screening, 130 lower limb prosthetic articles and 117 upper limb prosthetic articles were included in this review. Multiple limitations in the literature were identified, particularly a lack of long-term, larger-scale studies; research into the training requirements for these technologies and the necessary rectification processes; and a high range of variance of production workflows and materials which makes drawing conclusions difficult.

CONCLUSIONS: These limitations create a barrier to adequate evidence-based decision-making for clinicians, technology developers, and wider policymakers. Increased collaboration between academia, industry, and clinical teams across more of the pathway to market for new technologies could be a route to addressing these gaps.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2024. Vol. 48, no 5, p. 574-589
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-64157DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000351ISI: 001336466800012PubMedID: 38625697Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85199554501Local ID: HOA;intsam;950151OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-64157DiVA, id: diva2:1856828
Available from: 2024-05-08 Created: 2024-05-08 Last updated: 2025-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ramstrand, Nerrolyn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ramstrand, Nerrolyn
By organisation
HHJ, Department of RehabilitationHHJ. CHILD
In the same journal
Prosthetics and Orthotics International
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 93 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf