Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Work-Integrated-Learning by Inaction – Exploring Organizational Reflections on AI-Transformation in the Manufacturing Industry
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Supply Chain and Operations Management.
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Supply Chain and Operations Management.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8993-4306
2024 (English)In: Abstract book WIL Conference 2024: 2nd International Conference on Work-Integrated Learning / [ed] U. Lundh Snis, L. Carlsson, P. Assmo & H. Jacobs, Trollhättan: University West , 2024, p. 13-13Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Artificial intelligence (AI) has for the last decade been expected to revolutionize the way we work. However, as many industries are facing more complex problems as an effect of technological development and globalizations, companies are experiencing challenges in finalizing AI-projects and fully integrating AI into their operations, not least in the manufacturing industry. To face these challenges, it is suggested that manufacturing industry could benefit from enhancing their work-integrated learning related to AI and AI transformation. In addition, one of the considered success factors in technological development and organizational change is the way that it is reflected on by the organization. This paper employs an action-based perspective, in which learning is generated by and in action, that is, in the reflection on experiences. And so, with a qualitative focus group study, we sought to explore how manufacturing industry organizations reflect on action in a potential AI-transformation. However, the results showed that the participating organizations instead displayed an inaction stance when discussing AI-transformation, demonstrating a general passivity towards the transformation as a concrete change process. We employ theories of psychological safety, maneuver space and sense of coherence to analyze our empirical results. Moreover, we discuss our findings based on the idea of action and inaction as contradictory forces that adverse each other in terms of learning as well as the theoretical and practical implications of our study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Trollhättan: University West , 2024. p. 13-13
Keywords [en]
AI-transformation, action, inaction, work-integrated learning, manufacturing industry
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-64020ISBN: 978-91-89325-69-2 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-64020DiVA, id: diva2:1852888
Conference
2nd Conference on Work-Integrated-Learning (WIL24), Hoedspruit, South Africa, 3-5 April 2024
Available from: 2024-04-19 Created: 2024-04-19 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Abstract

Authority records

Mohlin, AliceEngström, Annika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mohlin, AliceEngström, Annika
By organisation
JTH, Supply Chain and Operations Management
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and ErgonomicsEducational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 105 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf