Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Middle-range theorising supporting and supported by action research: focusing on practitioner preparedness
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Supply Chain and Operations Management.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7867-3895
Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2025 (English)In: Production planning & control (Print), ISSN 0953-7287, E-ISSN 1366-5871, Vol. 36, no 2, p. 222-235Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Increased demand for actionable knowledge in operations- and supply chain management has fuelled the interest in collaborative, action-oriented research design as well as modes of theorising that generate adaptable and actionable frameworks. Whilst action research (AR) design as well as middle-range theories (MRT) offer guiding principles herein, they are researcher centric in nature. It is taken for granted that practitioners that enter such an endeavour have a certain level of knowledge or experience prior to the initial stages of formalising the research problem. Practitioners in non-academic, operations management-intensive industries or craftsmanship-based industries, such as construction or carpeting (often in the SME range) are often neither prepared nor equipped with the principles necessary to convey their managerial challenges into collaborative research design. This risk limiting or even hindering altogether such participation. This paper elaborates on combining the logic of AR and MRT. By conceptualising a preparatory phase for initiating practitioner engagement, complementing the conventional AR cycle, a four-step approach is presented: (1) Identifying a joint interest; (2) Teaching ? Awakening interest in the topic through MRT frameworks; (3) Accepting buy-in to the AR cycle and determining the problem; and (4) Proposing MRT frameworks for analysis and entering the traditional AR cycle.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025. Vol. 36, no 2, p. 222-235
Keywords [en]
Action research, middle- range theory, engaged scholars, practitioner preparedness, theorising
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-63811DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2024.2327347ISI: 001182624200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85187417152Local ID: HOA;;941511OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-63811DiVA, id: diva2:1843962
Available from: 2024-03-12 Created: 2024-03-12 Last updated: 2025-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Bäckstrand, Jenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bäckstrand, Jenny
By organisation
JTH, Supply Chain and Operations Management
In the same journal
Production planning & control (Print)
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and ErgonomicsOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 158 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf