Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Public acceptability of policy instruments for reducing fossil fuel consumption in East Africa
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Economics and Development Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8965-1501
Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2024 (English)In: Climate Policy, ISSN 1469-3062, E-ISSN 1752-7457, Vol. 24, no 6, p. 812-827Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
00. Sustainable Development, 11. Sustainable cities and communities, 12. Responsible consumption and production, 13. Climate action, 16. Peace, justice and strong institutions, 17. Partnerships for the goals
Abstract [en]

In recent decades, there has been increasing research interest in individuals’ support of and resistance to climate and environmental policy instruments. However, there is an empirical bias in the literature, as few studies have been conducted in low-income countries. Based on a survey with 4,766 respondents we identify the level of public acceptability for climate policy instruments and their determinants in East Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda). While our sample is not fully representative of the East-African population, we capture highly educated individuals in urban areas, who are likely to have a large influence on policy processes. In line with previous studies in other contexts, we find that higher education and climate change concern are linked to the acceptability of policies aimed at reducing fossil fuel consumption. Specifying how the revenue from a climate tax or subsidy removal would be used, almost doubled the support for these policy instruments. In contrast to earlier studies, we find that investments in social programmes, not environmental programmes, was the revenue specification that increased the acceptability the most. One possible explanation would be that in a context where poverty is more prevalent, social issues are more salient to people. We also find weak associations between trust in government and the acceptability of climate policy instruments in East Africa and large heterogeneity across the five focal East African countries. Besides establishing an empirical foundation for future research on climate policy support in East Africa, the study provides essential policy insights: Investing in education and improved information, contributing to increased awareness and understanding of climate concerns, can potentially increase support for climate policy proposals also in the East African context. Earmarking revenues from climate policy instruments for social programmes may also significantly boost support. However, as our study is not fully representative of the population in the five countries and relies on stated preferences, which may be subject to different biases, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2024. Vol. 24, no 6, p. 812-827
Keywords [en]
acceptability, Africa, climate policy, Pigouvian taxes, public support, revenue recycling
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-63401DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2302319ISI: 001144515000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85182445996Local ID: HOA;intsam;930172OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-63401DiVA, id: diva2:1830435
Funder
Sida - Swedish International Development Cooperation AgencyAvailable from: 2024-01-23 Created: 2024-01-23 Last updated: 2025-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Nordén, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordén, Anna
By organisation
JIBS, Economics
In the same journal
Climate Policy
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 71 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf