Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Supporting or restricting mathematical communication and reasoning in teaching 6-year olds
University of Gothenburg.
Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication, HLK, Practice Based Educational Research, Mathematics Education Research.
2023 (English)In: EARLI 2023: Book of abstracts, 2023, p. 446-446Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Sustainable development
00. Sustainable Development, 4. Quality education
Abstract [en]

Communication and reasoning in mathematics is described as important for student learning. Hence, teachers have a central role to invite students to engage in reasoning and collective problem solving. One common way to promote this is for the teacher to ask questions. However, there is limited knowledge of how teachers make use of the input provided by students on the asked questions in their mathematics teaching to support further learning and mathematical inquiry. In the present study, we investigated qualitative differences in how preschool class teachers responded to and incorporated 6-year old students’ input in teaching about numbers and arithmetic. The data gathered for analysis consisted of fieldnotes collected through observations of 145 mathematics teaching episodes in 95 classes. To make it possible to map the qualitative different ways teachers responded to and incorporated students’ input in their teaching, the Mediating Primary Mathematics framework was used as an analytical tool. The results show that teachers responded to and incorporated student input in different ways in their teaching. In almost 2/3 of the teaching episodes, teachers stopped at only briefly confirming the input given as right or wrong, or just gave generally encouraging responses to the student. In just under 1/3 of the teaching episodes, teachers took advantage of and incorporated student input in their teaching to advance and verify their mathematical reasoning. This highlights that teachers may develop their ways of responding to and elaborating on students’ input in teaching, which could improve students’ opportunities for learning mathematics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. p. 446-446
Keywords [en]
Early Childhood Education, Mathematics/Numeracy, Primary Education, Teaching/Instructional Strategies
National Category
Pedagogy Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-62858OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-62858DiVA, id: diva2:1810277
Conference
The 20th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, 22-26 August 2023, Thessaloniki, Greece
Available from: 2023-11-07 Created: 2023-11-07 Last updated: 2023-11-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Abstract

Authority records

Ekdahl, Anna-Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekdahl, Anna-Lena
By organisation
Mathematics Education Research
PedagogyMathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 7 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf