Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is FDI inflow bad for environmental sustainability?
Department of Economics, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7902-4683
2023 (English)In: Environment, Development and Sustainability, ISSN 1387-585X, E-ISSN 1573-2975Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Sustainable development
00. Sustainable Development
Abstract [en]

In the last few years, discussions and debates around environmental sustainability have become a key goal of the global agenda. This is because the latest studies and our direct experiences of the consequences of environmental degradation and climate change are showing that economic models need some urgent changes. The goal of this paper was to investigate the effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) flow on environmental sustainability globally. The balanced panel data of 100 countries from 2000 to 2020 were used for empirical analysis to understand the relationship between FDI inflow and environmental performance index (EPI) for countries with different income levels. The estimation is made using the two-step system GMM model as it gives more robust and efficient results in this study. The results of the dynamic panel model do not support the pollution haven hypothesis, i.e., FDI inflow was not found to have any statistically significant effect on EPI. The findings of the paper suggest that to improve environmental quality globally, it is important for governments to invest more in renewable energy projects as clean energy consumption can be one of the most efficient solutions for reducing the impact of climate change. Moreover, countries need to reduce the unemployment rate as it significantly improves the environmental quality according to our estimation results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2023.
Keywords [en]
Clean energy, Environmental performance index, Foreign direct investment, GMM dynamic panel data model, Pollution haven hypothesis
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-62509DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03844-3ISI: 001061566400002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85170062210Local ID: HOA;intsam;905655OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-62509DiVA, id: diva2:1798779
Available from: 2023-09-20 Created: 2023-09-20 Last updated: 2023-10-17

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Heshmati, Almas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Heshmati, Almas
By organisation
JIBS, EconomicsJIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE)
In the same journal
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 41 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf