Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fatigue experienced by people with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of assessment tools and decision tree
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Neurodisability and Rehabilitation, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Neurodisability and Rehabilitation, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; School of Health and Biomedical Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0444-5918
Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Neurodisability and Rehabilitation, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9095-358X
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare. Neurodisability and Rehabilitation, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; School of Health and Biomedical Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, E-ISSN 1464-5165, Vol. 46, no 9, p. 1751-1759Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of self- and proxy-report fatigue assessment tools used in studies of people with cerebral palsy (CP) of all ages, and to develop a fatigue assessment tool decision tree for clinicians and researchers.

Materials and methods: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane) were searched to September 2021 to identify studies assessing self-reported fatigue in people with CP of any age. The assessment tools utilised were extracted and two reviewers appraised the tool characteristics, clinical utility and psychometric properties. A decision tree for selecting fatigue assessment tools was constructed.

Results: Ten assessment tools were identified across thirty-nine studies, three of which are valid and reliable for assessing fatigue severity and impact in people with CP. A four-level fatigue assessment tool decision tree was constructed. No valid and reliable tool for assessing cognitive fatigue was identified; responsiveness has not been evaluated in any tool for people with CP.

Conclusions: Physical fatigue screening and assessment tools for people with CP are available and are presented in our decision tree, however their utility as outcome measures remains unclear. Cognitive fatigue is understudied and poorly understood, further work is required in this area.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION 

  • Current measurement tools to screen and assess physical fatigue in people with cerebral palsy (CP) are valid and reliable and are presented in our 4-level decision tree to guide assessment tool selection.
  • The responsiveness of these measurement tools to screen and assess physical fatigue has not been evaluated, therefore their utility as outcome measures in people with CP is unclear.
  • Cognitive fatigue is understudied and poorly understood in people with CP.
  • Valid and reliable tools to assess cognitive fatigue in people with CP are not available.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2024. Vol. 46, no 9, p. 1751-1759
Keywords [en]
Cerebral palsy, fatigue, self-report, assessment tools, decision tree
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-60482DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2205175ISI: 000984790800001PubMedID: 37158234Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85158957042Local ID: HOA;intsam;882421OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-60482DiVA, id: diva2:1759965
Available from: 2023-05-29 Created: 2023-05-29 Last updated: 2024-05-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eres, RobertSawyer, Susan M.Johnston, Leanne M.Cleary, StaceyReddihough, Dinah
By organisation
School of Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf