Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
In search of relevance: exploring board work in hybrid organizations through an engaged scholarship approach
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1606-3877
2023 (English)In: Handbook of research methods for corporate governance / [ed] N. Cucari, S. Yamak, S. E. De Falco & B. Lee, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, p. 71-89Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Introductory paragraph: Hybrid organizations blend aspects of different organizational forms, identities, and institutional logics (Battilana & Lee, 2014; Jay, 2013; Pache & Santos, 2013). An ideal illustration of such organizations is social enterprises (hereafter, SE) that primarily aim at developing sustainable solutions to social problems while remaining significantly dependent on commercial revenue for their survival (Doherty, Haugh, & Lyon, 2014). These dual economic/social missions pose a host of challenges to SE governance. Studies suggest that governance in SEs often resembles a “grey zone” where boards involve heterogeneous configurations and practices that seek to minimize the risk of “mission drift” while achieving a balance between external and internal stakeholder demands (Cornforth, 2014; Ebrahim, Battilana,& Mair, 2014; Mair, Mayer, & Lutz, 2015; Mair, Wolf, & Ioan, 2020). Naturally, this requires SE boards to be configured with individuals who hold expertise both in the commercial sector and societal issues. In practice, such ideal configurations are unusual due to SEs’ inclination to pro bono practices and democratic principles that often outweigh the need for board expertise (Cornforth, 2004; Stone & Ostrower, 2007). As a result, SEs need to secure a balance between their dual missions and install an appropriate board that can take stock of the divergent stakeholder demands and design strategies ensuring accountability to the stakeholders. Needless to say, this underscores the importance of boards knowing how to prioritize multiple and often competing stakeholder demands and social issues—a call that has also been highlighted in many recent publications on corporate governance (Amis, Barney, Mahoney, & Wang, 2020; Bachmann, Gillespie, & Priem, 2015; Barney, 2018; Krause & Miller, 2020).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. p. 71-89
Series
Handbooks of Research Methods in Management
Keywords [en]
corporate governance, hybrid organization, social enterprise, engaged scholarship, rigor and relevance, stakeholder engagement
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-60261DOI: 10.4337/9781802202892.00012Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85166049496ISBN: 9781802202885 (print)ISBN: 9781802202892 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-60261DiVA, id: diva2:1753404
Available from: 2023-04-27 Created: 2023-04-27 Last updated: 2023-10-18Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. The role of the board chair: Changing expectations and hybrid organizations
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The role of the board chair: Changing expectations and hybrid organizations
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this dissertation is to enhance our understanding of the changing role of the board chair and what this means for hybrid organizations and their board work. Historically, the role of the boards and their chairs evolved around safeguarding shareholders’ financial interests. Whilst this responsibility persists, boards are increasingly expected to embrace societal issues in board governance discussions and to rethink performance measurement systems to incorporate the social impacts generated by their organizations. To navigate these challenges, boards are encouraged to adopt hybrid board governance systems that strike a balance between financial and social mission targets. Board chairs can guide boards to secure such a hybrid outlook, but we lack academic insights on this role beyond financial performance. Systematically reviewing four decades of research, the first article of the dissertation demonstrates the need and opportunities for considering divergent stakeholder interests and contextual factors influencing the role of the board chair. Building on this, the second article engages with board chairs and general secretaries in social hybrid organizations and unearths different board-specific and field level challenges that currently hinder boards from implementing social impact measurements. Subsequently, the third article discusses how adopting a qualitative, engaged scholarship approach can generate practice informed research, contributing new understanding for boards and their chairs. Together, these insights offer implications for theory and practice and promote an agenda for future research that embraces a social purpose beyond profit maximization.

Abstract [sv]

Syftet med denna avhandling är att öka vår förståelse för hur styrelseordförandens roll förändras och vad detta betyder för hybridorganisationer och deras styrelsearbete. Historiskt sett har styrelsens och dess ordförandes roll bestått i att skydda aktieägarnas finansiella intressen. Även om detta ansvar kvarstår, förväntas styrelser i allt högre grad lyfta samhällsfrågor i sina styrelsediskussioner vilket föranleder en omprövning av rådande prestationsmätningssystem för att inkludera de sociala effekter som genereras av deras organisationer. För att navigera dessa utmaningar uppmuntras styrelser att anta hybrida styrsystem som kan balansera både finansiella och sociala mål. Styrelseordföranden kan vägleda styrelser för att säkerställa detta hybrida tillvägagångssätt, men vi saknar akademisk kunskap om denna utmaning utöver fokus på finansiella resultat. Genom att systematiskt granska fyra decennier av forskning visar avhandlingens första artikel på behovet av att överväga olika intressenters intressen och kontexter som påverkar styrelseordförandens roll. Med utgångspunkt i detta, undersöker den andra artikeln styrelseordföranden och generalsekreterare i sociala hybridorganisationer och påvisar olika styrelsespecifika institutionella utmaningar som hindrar styrelser från att genomföra mätningar av sin sociala påverkan. Därefter diskuterar den tredje artikeln hur en specifik forskningsmetod kallad “engaged scholarship”, kan generera praktiskt relevant forskning som bygger ny förståelse för styrelser och deras ordföranden. Tillsammans ger dessa insikter bidrag till teori och praktik och främjar en agenda för framtida forskning som anammar sociala syften bortom vinstmaximering.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Jönköping: Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, 2023. p. 91
Series
JIBS Dissertation Series, ISSN 1403-0470 ; 158
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-62687 (URN)978-91-7914-023-6 (ISBN)978-91-7914-024-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-11-17, B1014, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2023-10-18 Created: 2023-10-18 Last updated: 2023-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Banerjee, Anup

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Banerjee, Anup
By organisation
JIBS, Business AdministrationJIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO)
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 119 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf