Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity and reliability of the Turkish Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T) in mental health
Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Hamidiye Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey.
Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Gulhane Health Sciences, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences Diskapi Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, ISSN 1103-8128, E-ISSN 1651-2014, Vol. 30, no 6, p. 796-802Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: People with psychiatric disabilities often find it difficult to maintain a satisfactory occupational balance.

Aims/objectives: This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T) in mental health.

Material and methods: OBQ11-T was applied to 149 people for construct validity analysis and to 61 of them for reliability analysis. Validity was determined using factor analyses. The reliability of the OBQ between the first and second evaluations was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each item and the total OBQ11-T score. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha.

Results: The results of factor analysis revealed one factor that explains 35.94% of the total variance in the model. OBQ11-T item 1 had the lowest and OBQ11-T item 4 had the highest factor loadings. The model fits the data according to the indices of relative fit (RMSEA = 0.087, CMIN/DF = 2.129, CFI = 0.901). There was an excellent correlation between test and retest OBQ11-T total scores (ICC = 0.905). All items of the OBQ11-T showed good reliability. Cronbach’s alpha for the OBQ11-T total score was 0.839, indicating acceptable internal consistency.

Conclusions and significance: The current study showed that OBQ11-T is a valid and reliable tool for measuring the self-rated occupational balance of people with mental illness.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2023. Vol. 30, no 6, p. 796-802
Keywords [en]
Instrument, mental illness, occupation, occupational science
National Category
Psychiatry Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-59729DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2164351ISI: 000912759400001PubMedID: 36632045Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85146710855Local ID: ;intsam;1734590OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-59729DiVA, id: diva2:1734590
Available from: 2023-02-06 Created: 2023-02-06 Last updated: 2023-08-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wagman, PetraHåkansson, Carita

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wagman, PetraHåkansson, Carita
By organisation
HHJ, Department of RehabilitationHHJ. ADULT
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
PsychiatryOccupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 164 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf