Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Differences in the use of everyday technology among persons with MCI, SCI and older adults without known cognitive impairment
Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: International psychogeriatrics, ISSN 1041-6102, E-ISSN 1741-203X, Vol. 29, no 7, p. 1193-1200Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: To use valid subjective reports sensible to cognitive decline is vital to identify very early signs of dementia development. Use of everyday technology (ET) has been shown to be sensitive to differentiate adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from controls, but the group with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) has not yet been examined. This study aims to investigate and compare self-perceived ability in ET use and number of ETs reported as actually used in a sample of older adults with SCI, MCI, and older adults with no known cognitive impairment, i.e. controls.

Methods: Older adults with MCI (n = 29), SCI ( n = 26), and controls (n = 30) were interviewed with the short version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (S-ETUQ) to capture self-perceived ability in ET use and number of ETs used. To generate individual measures of ability to use ET, Rasch analysis was used. The measures were then compared group-wise using ANCOVA. The numbers of ETs used were compared group-wise with ANOVA.

Results: Controls versus SCI and MCI differed significantly regarding ETs reported as used, but not SCI versus MCI. Similarly, in ability to use ET, controls versus SCI and MCI differed significantly but not SCI versus MCI.

Conclusions: The significantly lower numbers of ETs reported as actually used and the lower ability in SCI and MCI groups compared to controls suggest that ET use is affected already in very minor cognitive decline. This indicates that self-reported ET use based on the S-ETUQ is sensitive to detect changes already in SCI.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press, 2017. Vol. 29, no 7, p. 1193-1200
Keywords [en]
ADL, cognitive impairment, adult, aged, Article, cognitive defect, controlled study, Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, female, health behavior, human, interview, major clinical study, male, mild cognitive impairment, questionnaire, self report, subjective cognitive impairment, technology, daily life activity, dementia, middle aged, multivariate analysis, neuropsychological test, psychological rating scale, psychology, regression analysis, self concept, Sweden, Activities of Daily Living, Cognitive Dysfunction, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires
National Category
Gerontology, specialising in Medical and Health Sciences Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-59578DOI: 10.1017/S1041610217000643ISI: 000402843000017PubMedID: 28412981Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85017415973OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-59578DiVA, id: diva2:1733344
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and WelfareSwedish Research CouncilAvailable from: 2023-02-02 Created: 2023-02-02 Last updated: 2023-02-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Rosenberg, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rosenberg, Lena
In the same journal
International psychogeriatrics
Gerontology, specialising in Medical and Health SciencesOccupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 32 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf