Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analyzing human factors and complexities of mining and O&G process accidents using FRAM: Copiapo (Chile) and FPSO CSM (Brazil) cases
Kalmar Maritime Academy, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden; Academia UP de SMS, Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1666-7507
2023 (English)In: Process safety progress, ISSN 1066-8527, E-ISSN 1547-5913, Vol. 42, no S1, p. S9-S18Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
00. Sustainable Development, 9. Industry, innovation and infrastructure, 17. Partnerships for the goals
Abstract [en]

The study presented in this research is a systematic human factors approach comparing two striking process accidents in Latin America: the Copiapo mining accident (2010), at the San Jose copper-gold mine, in Chile, and the FPSO CSM accident (2015), at Camarupim offshore oil field, in Brazil. Despite being different industrial segments-mining and O&G-more similarities than differences were observed in the treatment of process safety anomalies, especially those related to major accidents. The intense interactions between workers, equipment and processes, in both industries, have been making significant developments in the edge of innovation and technology, however increasing the complexity of risks in the workplaces. Furthermore, the differences between the preparation and handling of emergency situations show how complex, and critical, process safety is in these industrial areas. Aiming to adequately evidence how this complexity is intrinsically part of the various system that form the entire process, the FRAM (Functional Resonance Analysis Method) was utilized to model and analyses both accidents, under a human factors approach. Interactions and interrelations between LOPC, nontechnical skills, resilience and technical procedures were noticed as crucial for process safety and productivity of daily operations, as well as the preparedness for emergency situations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2023. Vol. 42, no S1, p. S9-S18
Keywords [en]
FRAM, human factors, mining, offshore, safety
National Category
Mineral and Mine Engineering Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-58853DOI: 10.1002/prs.12428ISI: 000873845500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85141412892OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-58853DiVA, id: diva2:1709913
Available from: 2022-11-10 Created: 2022-11-10 Last updated: 2024-01-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hollnagel, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hollnagel, Erik
By organisation
The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Process safety progress
Mineral and Mine EngineeringProduction Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 56 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf