Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The impact of crowdsourcing in product development: An exploratory study of quirky based on the perspective of participants
Human Technology Group, Department of Electromechanical Engineering and Centre for Aerospace Science and Technology, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9759-9133
Human Technology Group, Department of Electromechanical Engineering and Centre for Aerospace Science and Technology, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Human Technology Group, Department of Electromechanical Engineering and Centre for Aerospace Science and Technology, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
2018 (English)In: International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, ISSN 2165-0349, E-ISSN 2165-0357, Vol. 6, no 1-2, p. 114-128Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
Sustainable Development
Abstract [en]

This paper focuses on Quirky, a social product development (SPD) company, in order to explore the SPD phenomenon, as well as the self-assessed level of the experience quality arising from participation in SPD. The study investigates the perceived benefits to designers arising from their participation, the motivators of participation, as well as the participants’ perception of SPD characteristics. It involved a focus session with seven industrial design engineering master students, and yielded results from which a questionnaire was developed within the study. The questionnaire was completed by voluntary participants (7 trained designers and 26 non-design trained participants) from the worldwide community of platform users of the selected SPD company. The questionnaire results suggest that the positive aspects of the SPD participants’ experience include the interest caused by participation and motivation to earn money, as well as the perception of a wide range of ideas and contributions available in the SPD platform. Negative aspects of the participants’ experience found in the analysis of the questionnaire data include high individual ratings for learning caused by participation as well as a keen awareness of too many unnecessary ideas in the SPD platform. The analysis also suggests that formally trained designers have some advantage in SPD participation compared to non-design trained participants. Finally, the results support the conclusion that the questionnaire respondents did not view SPD as detrimental to designers’ future job prospects. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2018. Vol. 6, no 1-2, p. 114-128
Keywords [en]
Collaborative creativity, Crowdsourcing, Design practice, Designer job prospects, Idea generation, Innovation management, Social product development
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-58650DOI: 10.1080/21650349.2016.1216331ISI: 000428125000009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85042291535OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-58650DiVA, id: diva2:1703968
Available from: 2022-10-17 Created: 2022-10-17 Last updated: 2022-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Coelho, Denis A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Coelho, Denis A.
In the same journal
International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf