Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Third-Generation Innovation Policy: System Transformation or Reinforcing Business as Usual?
Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8861-8731
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Media, Management and Transformation Centre (MMTC). The Ratio Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8625-8744
2022 (English)In: Questioning the Entrepreneurial State: Status-quo, Pitfalls, and the Need for Credible Innovation Policy / [ed] Karl Wennberg & Christian Sandström, Cham: Springer, 2022, p. 201-217Chapter in book (Refereed)
Sustainable development
Sustainable Development
Abstract [en]

There has been a shift in innovation policy in recent years toward more focus on systemic transformation and changed directionality. In this chapter, we describe a collection of challenges that such policies need to address. Based on a review of dominant frameworks regarding socio-technical transitions, we compare these theories with examples of innovation policy in different countries. Systemic transformation across an economy usually requires a process of creative destruction in which new competencies may be required, actors need to be connected in novel ways, and institutions may need to be changed. Our empirical illustrations show that support programs and initiatives across Europe do not always seem to result in such a process, as they include mechanisms favoring large, established firms and universities. These actors have often fine-tuned their activities and capabilities to the existing order, and therefore have few incentives to engage in renewal. As the incumbent actors also control superior financial and relational resources, there is a risk that they captivate innovation policies and thus reinforce established structures rather than contributing to systemic transformation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cham: Springer, 2022. p. 201-217
Series
International Studies in Entrepreneurship, ISSN 1572-1922, E-ISSN 2197-5884 ; 53
Keywords [en]
Innovation policy, Institutions, Regulatory capture, System transformation, Third generation
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-58070DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94273-1_11Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85133740366ISBN: 978-3-030-94272-4 (print)ISBN: 978-3-030-94275-5 (print)ISBN: 978-3-030-94273-1 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-58070DiVA, id: diva2:1684585
Available from: 2022-07-27 Created: 2022-07-27 Last updated: 2022-07-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Moodysson, JerkerSandström, Christian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Moodysson, JerkerSandström, Christian
By organisation
Jönköping International Business SchoolJIBS, Business AdministrationJIBS, Media, Management and Transformation Centre (MMTC)
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 220 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf