Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do probiotics cause a shift in the microbiota of dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dept. of Odontology and Oral Health Science. Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3738-1217
Division of Molecular Periodontology, Department of Odontology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Odontology and Oral Health, Public Dental Care of Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
2022 (English)In: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, E-ISSN 2235-2988, Vol. 12, article id 823985Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: The primary aim of this current systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the potential microbiological effect of probiotics on the implant microbiota. The secondary aim was to evaluate if probiotics have any effect as an adjunct to non-surgical peri-implant treatment in reducing peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis clinical parameters—bleeding on probing, modified Gingival Index, and pocket depth.

Methods: The research focus questions were constructed in accordance with the Participants, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) criteria, and a PROSPERO protocol was registered. A comprehensive systematic search in MEDLINE via the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases was conducted. Two independent reviewers screened the reports based on the PICO criteria—inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: In total, 467 records were identified, and ultimately, 7 papers were included: 3 papers in the qualitative synthesis of microbiological effect and 4 in the meta-analysis synthesis on pocket depth. The data synthesis showed that probiotics had no detectable effect on the implant microflora, and in the following data synthesis, no clinical peri-implantitis variable showed a significantly beneficial effect from probiotics in the test group compared to the control group.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this review, the oral implant microflora is not affected by probiotics nor do probiotics add any effect to the conventional non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2022. Vol. 12, article id 823985
Keywords [en]
probiotics, dental implant, microbiota, peri-implantitis, peri-implant mucositis
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-56046DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.823985ISI: 000777671000001PubMedID: 35372118Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85127516366Local ID: GOA;;56046OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-56046DiVA, id: diva2:1645899
Funder
Futurum - Academy for Health and Care, Jönköping County Council, SwedenAvailable from: 2022-03-21 Created: 2022-03-21 Last updated: 2022-05-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sayardoust, Shariel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sayardoust, Shariel
By organisation
HHJ, Dept. of Odontology and Oral Health Science
In the same journal
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 129 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf