Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome measure and team tool in a day treatment program
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för samhälls- och välfärdsstudier.
Landstinget i Östergötland.
Landstinget i Östergötland.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2764-3722
Linköpings universitet, Geriatrik.
Show others and affiliations
2003 (English)In: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, E-ISSN 1464-5165, Vol. 25, no 10, p. 497-506Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To investigate the usefulness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in a day treatment programme for clients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Method: The study was conducted in two parts. In the first part rehabilitation without changes in the programme was performed (n = 16). After that the COPM was introduced to all team members. In part two the COPM was used (n = 40). Clients' experiences of participation in the process were studied via a structured interview 2 - 4 weeks after discharge in both parts. Qualitative interviews were conducted with team members before part one and after completion of part two.

Results: Staff expressed that the COPM improved client participation in the rehabilitation process. Goals were formulated distinctly, and focused on activity and performance rather than function. Team conferences were focused on the client's needs. Outcome was considered clear and evident to the client. The changes in client routines demands thorough introduction, support and involvement, and takes time. Involvement and motivation for changing practice were difficult to obtain, this could be a result of a large staff turnover during the data collection period.

Conclusions: The COPM should be seen as an aid to ensuring client participation in the goal formulation process, and facilitating treatment planning and evaluation of outcome.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2003. Vol. 25, no 10, p. 497-506
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-55586DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000090560ISI: 000183147800001PubMedID: 12745961Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0037799593OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-55586DiVA, id: diva2:1627792
Available from: 2007-03-23 Created: 2022-01-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wressle, EwaNeher, MargitMarcusson, JanHenriksson, Chris

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wressle, EwaNeher, MargitMarcusson, JanHenriksson, Chris
In the same journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf