Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Trust and control in changing production environments
Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för ekonomistyrning och logistik (ELO).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0378-2995
Brock University, Canada.
2017 (English)In: Paper presented at the 7th Global Innovation & Knowledge Academy conference, Lisbon, Portugal, June 28-30, 2017, 2017Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

We examine the relationship between trust and control in four organizations implementing Lean Production in Sweden. Research on trust has conflicting views on the trust-control relationship, which are not resolved. Prior empirical studies show either that the relationship between trust and control is substitutive, or that it is complementary (Kalkman and Waard, 2016). Our results show that trust can be either a substitute or a complement depending on the source and incidence of control, which we identify as moderators of the trust-control relationship.

We find in two of our sites that control consists of workers and managers jointly developing and monitoring the work process itself. In these two companies, the source of control is jointly the workers and managers, and the control incidence is the work task. We observed a significant reduction in use of document-based asset control systems to control people and an increased use of personal communication to control work tasks instead. In this situation, Trust is a complement to Control because it mobilizes workers to contribute to the control process.

In the other two companies, even though pursuing LP, the managers developed the control indicators in traditional ways and thus the control source was the manager, and the control incidence was the workers or the machines. The control systems in these two companies retained use of a comprehensive document-based asset control system with numerous KPIs, mainly financial. In this situation, Control substitutes for Trust because the KPIs are selected by management because they reflect management goals and to not require workers to understand management goals, but just to accomplish the KPI.

Additionally we find that the concept of trust itself, becomes a matter for reflection by both managers and workers, in both sets of groups, as they navigate new production methods.

This result extends prior research by revealing that there are missing variables (control source and control incidence) which moderate the relationship between trust and control, and contribute to the contradictory results in the literature.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017.
Keywords [en]
Trust, Control, Changing production environments, Lean
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Economy, Business administration; Economy, Ekonomistyrning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-55310OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-55310DiVA, id: diva2:1619034
Conference
7th Global Innovation & Knowledge Academy conference, Lisbon, Portugal, June 28-30, 2017
Available from: 2017-06-07 Created: 2021-12-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Alpenberg, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Alpenberg, Jan
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf