Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An Essay on ‘Homo Projecticus’: Ontological Assumptions in the Projectified Society
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Civil Engineering and Lighting Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2495-9676
The Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship.
2022 (English)In: International Journal of Project Management, ISSN 0263-7863, E-ISSN 1873-4634, Vol. 40, no 4, p. 315-319Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This essay argues that as a consequence of the projectified society there is a need to consider the individual as inherently different from what rational and administrative decision-making ontologies suggest. ’Homo Projecticus’ is introduced as a new set of ontological assumptions, and the aim of this essay is to outline its characteristics and discuss its implications. In contrast to previous assumptions, we argue that the projectified society produces action seeking individuals who are guided by the notion that life is organized within multiple temporal contexts that both follow each other and exist in parallel. Thus, a key concern is how to create boundaries, or limits, in ways that enable action. Two key mechanisms are used: ‘time bracketing’ to define time limits, and ‘scope bracketing’ to define issues or tasks. Consequently, with an aim of completing tasks through appropriate actions, the rationality guiding decision-making and actions is ‘bounded by brackets’, which means that, in contrast to previous ontologies, the limits for rationality are created by the decision-makers themselves. Through bracketing, sensible segments are created, which enables action to be reached.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 40, no 4, p. 315-319
Keywords [en]
Homo Projecticus, Ontology, Philosophy of science, Project management, Project studies, Behavioral research, Decision making, Administrative decision making, Decision makers, Decisions makings, Homo projecticu, Ontology's, Project study
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-55266DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.11.004ISI: 000805814000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85120001706OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-55266DiVA, id: diva2:1617238
Available from: 2021-12-06 Created: 2021-12-06 Last updated: 2022-10-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Jacobsson, Mattias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jacobsson, Mattias
By organisation
JTH, Civil Engineering and Lighting Science
In the same journal
International Journal of Project Management
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 161 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf