System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Strings attached: Socioemotional wealth mixed gambles in the cash management choices of family firms
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli, 1, Milano, 20123, Italy.
The Autonomous University of Barcelona, Campus de la UAB, Plaça Cívica, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO). Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8203-4655
Bocconi University, Via Roberto Sarfatti, 25, Milano, 20136, Italy.
2021 (English)In: The Journal of Family Business Strategy, ISSN 1877-8585, E-ISSN 1877-8593, Vol. 13, no 3, article id 100466Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Family owners differ from other types of owners due to the presence of socioemotional wealth (SEW) concerns. We take a closer look at this distinctive aspect by examining the impact of family control and influence dimension of SEW on the cash management choices of family firms, conceptualizing it as a mixed gamble choice. Our empirical analysis of 195 Italian firms listed on the Milan Stock Exchange between 2003 and 2015 shows that family firms derive more value and incur lower costs than nonfamily firms when they increase their cash holdings. We then delve deeper into family firms’ cash management choices by exploring how different levels of family control and influence as well as types of board governance arrangements moderate this relationship. The empirical results indicate that the positive effects of family ownership are more pronounced under a high level of family control and influence and with separation of the board chair and CEO positions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 13, no 3, article id 100466
Keywords [en]
Boards of directors, Cash holdings, Corporate governance, Mixed gamble, SEW
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-55066DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100466ISI: 000880403400007Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85117961093Local ID: HOA;intsam;776663OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-55066DiVA, id: diva2:1611404
Available from: 2021-11-15 Created: 2021-11-15 Last updated: 2022-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pittino, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pittino, Daniel
By organisation
JIBS, Business AdministrationJIBS, Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO)JIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE)
In the same journal
The Journal of Family Business Strategy
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 125 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf