Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Treatment of peri-implant mucositis using a glycine powder air-polishing or ultrasonic device: A randomized clinical trial
Department of Periodontology, Public Dental Service, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Periodontology, Public Dental Service, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1125-9662
Department of Periodontology, Public Dental Service, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oral Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden; Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden; School of Dental Sciences, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
2015 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, ISSN 0303-6979, E-ISSN 1600-051X, Vol. 42, no 5, p. 462-469Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim

To evaluate the clinical treatment effects of a glycine powder air-polishing or ultrasonic device on peri-implant mucositis.

Materials and methods

Thirty-seven patients with one implant diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis (probing depth ≥4 mm (0.2N) and bleeding on probing (BOP) (primary outcome)) were randomly assigned to treatment with either glycine powder air-polishing (GPAP) or ultrasonic (US) debridement. Treatment was performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. Professional supra gingival cleaning was performed at 9 and 12 months. Oral hygiene instructions were reinforced at each visit.

Results

At 12 months there was a statistically significant reduction in mean plaque score, bleeding on probing and number of periodontal pockets ≥4 mm within the treatment groups compared to baseline. The percentages of diseased sites were significantly reduced for both groups.

Conclusions

Treatment with a glycine powder air-polishing or an ultrasonic device is effective in non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2015. Vol. 42, no 5, p. 462-469
Keywords [en]
air-abrasive device, mechanical therapy, non-surgical treatment, peri-implant mucositis, amino acid receptor affecting agent, glycine, powder, tooth implant, adult, aged, classification, comparative study, controlled study, dental prophylaxis, devices, education, female, follow up, gingiva disease, gingiva overgrowth, human, male, middle aged, mouth hygiene, periodontal index, periodontal pocket, plaque index, procedures, randomized controlled trial, single blind procedure, stomatitis, tooth brushing, treatment outcome, ultrasound therapy, very elderly, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implants, Dental Plaque Index, Dental Polishing, Follow-Up Studies, Gingival Overgrowth, Gingival Recession, Glycine Agents, Humans, Oral Hygiene, Powders, Single-Blind Method, Ultrasonic Therapy
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-53267DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12395ISI: 000354495400008PubMedID: 25851433Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84929512224OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-53267DiVA, id: diva2:1569934
Available from: 2021-06-21 Created: 2021-06-21 Last updated: 2021-06-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Norderyd, Ola

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norderyd, Ola
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf