Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bone response to free form-fabricated hydroxyapatite and zirconia scaffolds: A histological study in the human maxilla
Department of Periodontology, Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1125-9662
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, ISSN 0905-7161, E-ISSN 1600-0501, Vol. 20, no 4, p. 379-385Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: Synthetic and biological materials are increasingly used to provide temporary or permanent scaffolds for bone regeneration. This study evaluated the effect of material chemistry and microporosity on bone ingrowth and osseointegration of zirconia (ZrO2) and hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds in the human maxilla.

Material and methods: Twelve patients subjected to dental implant placement were enrolled in the study. Scaffolds of ZrO 2 and HA were placed in the maxilla of each subject, using a randomization protocol. After 3 months of healing, biopsies were harvested comprising the scaffolds and surrounding bone tissue. The biopsies were processed for histological evaluation and morphometric analysis (bone ingrowth and bone-to-scaffold contact).

Results: Healing was uneventful in all cases. All scaffolds demonstrated a measurable bone response using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Microporous HA scaffolds revealed four times larger bone ingrowth and seven times larger bone contact as compared with ZrO2 scaffolds.

Conclusion: The results show that chemistry and microporosity of HA promote bone ingrowth and bone contact of ceramic scaffolds in human maxilla.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2009. Vol. 20, no 4, p. 379-385
Keywords [en]
Bone regeneration, Free form fabrication, Human, Hydroxyapatite, Implant, Microporosity, Scaffolds, Zirconia, biomaterial, tissue scaffold, zirconium, zirconium oxide, adult, aged, article, bone prosthesis, chemistry, clinical trial, computer aided design, controlled clinical trial, controlled study, drug effect, jaw, maxilla, methodology, middle aged, nonparametric test, physiology, porosity, randomized controlled trial, tissue regeneration, tooth implantation, ultrastructure, Alveolar Process, Biocompatible Materials, Bone Substitutes, Computer-Aided Design, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Humans, Hydroxyapatites, Osseointegration, Statistics, Nonparametric, Tissue Scaffolds, Young Adult
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-53276DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01595.xISI: 000264065300008PubMedID: 19298291Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-62249188066OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-53276DiVA, id: diva2:1568798
Available from: 2021-06-18 Created: 2021-06-18 Last updated: 2021-06-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Norderyd, Ola

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norderyd, Ola
In the same journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf