Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The revision of competency standards for occupational therapy driver assessors in Australia: A mixed methods approach
Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Rehabilitation. Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6430-2823
Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
2021 (English)In: Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, ISSN 0045-0766, E-ISSN 1440-1630, Vol. 68, no 3, p. 257-271Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Competency standards outline the knowledge, skills, and attributes that are required for competent practice. This study describes the process followed to revise and validate the competency standards for occupational therapy driver assessors in order to guide clinical practice in this area of advanced occupational therapy practice.

Methods: A mixed methods research approach was used in this study. In phase 1, three focus groups with driver assessors reviewed and suggested revisions to the competency standards for occupational therapy driver assessors. Phase 2 involved content validation with key stakeholders through a focus group with consumers, written feedback from Australian state, and territory driver licensing authorities, and a two-round Delphi process with Australian occupational therapy driver assessors.

Results: Forty-nine occupational therapy driver assessors participated in the phase 1 focus groups. Deductive content analysis of the transcripts provided data to revise the competency standards. Inductive analysis provided an in-depth understanding of the participants’ views and was interpreted through six categories and their underlying subcategories: purposes and benefits; jurisdictional variations and practice diversity; language use; defining competent practice; challenging systems and processes; and competency standards content. Forty-eight occupational therapy driver assessors participated in the Delphi process. In Round 1, only 1 of the 164 competency standards and practice behaviours rated did not achieve the pre-determined 70% consensus rate. In Round 2, all statements achieved consensus, with the overall average consensus level obtained across the Round 2 statements at 96.8%.

Conclusion: The revised Australian Competency Standards for Occupational Therapy Driver Assessors have been endorsed by Occupational Therapy Australia and released for clinical use. The methods described in this research provide a framework suitable for revision or development of competency standards in both other areas of occupational therapy practice and other health-care professions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2021. Vol. 68, no 3, p. 257-271
Keywords [en]
automobile driving, competency standards, Delphi technique, focus group, occupational therapy, professional competence, standard of care
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-51969DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12722ISI: 000619305400001PubMedID: 33604929Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100980409Local ID: ;intsam;1532101OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-51969DiVA, id: diva2:1532101
Available from: 2021-03-01 Created: 2021-03-01 Last updated: 2021-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Unsworth, Carolyn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Unsworth, Carolyn
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Rehabilitation
In the same journal
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
Occupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 60 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf