Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Impact of forest and non-forest cover on drinking water treatment costs: panel evidence from Ethiopia
Environment and Climate Research Center (ECRC), Policy Studies Institute (PSI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE). Environment and Climate Research Center (ECRC), Policy Studies Institute (PSI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Washington, DC, United States.
2021 (English)In: Water and Environment Journal, ISSN 1747-6585, E-ISSN 1747-6593, Vol. 35, no 2, p. 772-790Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
Sustainable Development
Abstract [en]

Empirical assessment of relationships between land use and land cover and drinking water chemical treatment cost is lacking in developing countries. This study is conducted to assess the impact of forest and non-forest cover on water purification chemical costs in Ethiopia. A panel fixed effects regression model was applied and analysed at the watershed, upstream parts of the watershed, and different buffer distances ranging from 2.5 to 30 kilometers. Findings indicated that forest cover both at watershed and upstream level has a significant effect on water treatment chemical cost. Result showed that watershed forest cover contributes significantly to reduction of treatment chemical costs as compared to non-forest cover, but the contribution to the reduction of treatment cost declines as the buffer distance increases. Thus, the findings highlighted that protecting forest enhances water quality and reduces the chemical costs incurred to treat potable water.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2021. Vol. 35, no 2, p. 772-790
Keywords [en]
Ethiopia, fixed effect, forest, land use land cover (LULC), water purification, water treatment cost, Cost reduction, Developing countries, Forestry, Land use, Regression analysis, Surface waters, Water quality, Water treatment, Watersheds, Chemical costs, Chemical treatments, Empirical assessment, Fixed effects regression models, Forest cover, Land use and land cover, Treatment costs, Potable water
National Category
Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-51292DOI: 10.1111/wej.12669ISI: 000597710900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85097411059Local ID: ;intsam;1511872OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-51292DiVA, id: diva2:1511872
Funder
Swedish Environmental Protection AgencySida - Swedish International Development Cooperation AgencyAvailable from: 2020-12-21 Created: 2020-12-21 Last updated: 2022-01-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Fentie, Amare

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fentie, Amare
By organisation
JIBS, EconomicsJIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE)
In the same journal
Water and Environment Journal
Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 102 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf