Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Professionals’ experiences of using an improvement programme: applying quality improvement work in preschool contexts
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. IMPROVE (Improvement, innovation, and leadership in health and welfare).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8952-8773
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. IMPROVE (Improvement, innovation, and leadership in health and welfare).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0409-1985
Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication, HLK, Learning Practices inside and outside School (LPS), Plats, Identitet, Lärande (PIL).
2020 (English)In: BMJ Open Quality, ISSN 2399-6641, Vol. 9, no 3, article id e000933Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Improvement work can be used in preschools to enrich outdoor environment for children’s better health. Effective improvement work can facilitate the necessary changes, but little is known about professionals’ experiences of participation in improvement interventions. The aim was to evaluate how preschool staff experience quality improvement work, using the Breakthrough Series Collaborative improvement programme, to enhance outdoor environments.

Methods

An improvement intervention using a breakthrough collaborative was performed at 9 preschools in Sweden and examined with a longitudinal mixed method design. Staff completed questionnaires on 4 occasions (n=45 participants) and interviews took place after the intervention (n=16 participants).

Results

The intervention was successful in the sense that the staff were content with the learning seminars, and they had triggered physical changes in the outdoor environment. They integrated the quality improvement work with their ordinary work and increasingly involved the children. The staff tested improvement tools but did not find them entirely appropriate for their work, because they preferred existing methods for reflection.

Conclusions

The challenges in quality improvement work seem to be similar across contexts. Using the Breakthrough Series Collaborative in a public health intervention is promising but needs to be integrated with preunderstandings, current reflections and quality tools and models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2020. Vol. 9, no 3, article id e000933
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-50361DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000933ISI: 000672549900021PubMedID: 32830121Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85089794466Local ID: GOA HHJ 2020,GOA HLK 2020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-50361DiVA, id: diva2:1460355
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2016–20101Available from: 2020-08-24 Created: 2020-08-24 Last updated: 2021-08-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kjellström, SofiaAndersson, Ann-ChristineSamuelsson, Tobias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kjellström, SofiaAndersson, Ann-ChristineSamuelsson, Tobias
By organisation
The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and WelfareHHJ. IMPROVE (Improvement, innovation, and leadership in health and welfare)Plats, Identitet, Lärande (PIL)
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health EconomyEducational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 322 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf