The challenges of double-blind peer review in an era of increasing research transparency
2020 (English)In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, ISSN 0309-3646, E-ISSN 1746-1553, Vol. 44, no 4, p. 189-191Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]
Last year, we presented a vision to make Prosthetics and Orthotics International the journal of choice for all those who wish to access and contribute to the ever-increasing body of knowledge in our field.1 For Editors-in-Chief, this entails not only day-to-day management of manuscript submission, peer review, and publication processes, but also consideration of evolving principles and practices regarding the reporting of research. In this editorial, we discuss the challenges we experience in maintaining a double-blind peer review process while also encouraging research transparency.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2020. Vol. 44, no 4, p. 189-191
Keywords [en]
cannulation, clinical trial (topic), decision making, Editorial, human, medical research, peer review, publication, scientific literature, serial analysis of gene expression
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-50267DOI: 10.1177/0309364620937864ISI: 000552745800001PubMedID: 32660373Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85087980607OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-50267DiVA, id: diva2:1458834
2020-08-182020-08-182021-06-14Bibliographically approved