Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do environmental regulations affect FDI decisions? The pollution haven hypothesis revisited
Department of Economics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7902-4683
2021 (English)In: Science and Public Policy, ISSN 0302-3427, E-ISSN 1471-5430, Vol. 48, no 1, p. 122-131Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
Sustainable Development
Abstract [en]

This study attempts to verify the pollution haven hypothesis by investigating the impact of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment (FDI). It uses Korean outward FDI data covering the manufacturing sector for the period 2009–15. This study not only considers the stringency when measuring the degree of the host country’s environmental regulations but also the enforcement of these environmental regulations. Since the pollution haven’s effects indicate moving the polluting production stages from the home country to other (host) countries, we differentiate between investments in the ‘production’ part from those in the non-production part using location information about the host country. The main results of a FDI’s model estimation show that the stricter the regulations in host countries in Asia, the lower the FDI both intensively and extensively in these countries. This supports the prevalence of the effects of a pollution haven. However, before we separate FDI into the production and non-production parts, the effects of environmental regulations on FDI are hindered by FDI in the non-production part. The results indicate that while environmental regulations are determinants of FDI in the production part, they do not have a significant effect on FDI decisions when the entire FDI is considered.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2021. Vol. 48, no 1, p. 122-131
Keywords [en]
pollution haven hypothesis; environmental regulations; foreign direct investment
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-49360DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scaa060ISI: 000671565600010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85109019910Local ID: ;intsam;1441563OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-49360DiVA, id: diva2:1441563
Available from: 2020-06-16 Created: 2020-06-16 Last updated: 2021-07-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Heshmati, Almas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Heshmati, Almas
By organisation
JIBS, Economics
In the same journal
Science and Public Policy
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 104 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf