Student perceptions of growth-facilitating and growth-constraining factors of practice placements: A comparison between Japanese and United Kingdom occupational therapy studentsShow others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Occupational Therapy International, ISSN 0966-7903, E-ISSN 1557-0703, article id 8582470Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
This study compared growth-facilitating and growth-constraining experiences of practice placements as perceived by occupational therapy students from Japan and the United Kingdom (UK). Fifteen students from Japan and 14 from the UK used a nominal group technique (NGT) to rank, individually and in groups, their subjective learning experiences during practice placements. Qualitative analysis and simple tabulation based on ranking of items obtained in the NGT were performed. Five item categories were identified from both Japanese and UK students: self-reflection, the role of supervisor, sense of responsibility, clinical knowledge and skills, and time management. Results showed that all students perceived opportunities for self-reflection and feedback from supervisors as growth facilitating and students’ passive attitudes towards requirements of practice placements as growth constraining. Countryspecific differences between students were observed in clinical knowledge and skills, sense of responsibility, and time management. Japanese students perceived that preparatory study led to successfully treating clients during placement, and they tended to commit to placement assignments at the expense of time outside. UK students valued working independently with a sense of responsibility but considered time-management problems within their placement hours as growth constraining. These differences can be explained by different social norms and expectations of students from Japan and the UK.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2019. article id 8582470
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-46938DOI: 10.1155/2019/8582470ISI: 000501551400001PubMedID: 31885526Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85076549459Local ID: GOA HHJ 2019;HHJCHILDISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-46938DiVA, id: diva2:1374259
2019-11-292019-11-292020-01-02Bibliographically approved