Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Impact of “Inclusive” Education on the Language of Deaf Youth in Iquitos, Peru
Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication.
2019 (English)In: Sign Language Studies, ISSN 0302-1475, E-ISSN 1533-6263, Vol. 19, no 3, p. 348-374Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In Iquitos, Peru, a city of about 500,000 in the Peruvian Amazon, there is a disparity in the sign language skills of deaf individuals based on age. Large numbers of deaf adults use Peruvian Sign Language (LSP) as their primary means of communication and interact with one another at deaf association and church gatherings. In contrast, the majority of deaf youth younger than eighteen years old grow up primarily in hearing environments, without access to spoken Spanish or LSP. In order to communicate with the hearing individuals around them, many develop rudimentary manual communication systems, called homesigns. The disparity in language skills between deaf youth and deaf adults has not always been so prominent. In the past, deaf students in Iquitos gained access to LSP by attending one of four special education schools, where they could routinely interact with deaf peers and, sometimes, deaf adults. In recent years, however, deaf youth have been placed in regular education “inclusive” classrooms, where they are typically the only deaf person in the school and receive no support services to access the language of the classroom. This change in policy has had the unintended effect of cutting off the previous pathways by which deaf youth in Iquitos gained access to LSP in the classroom. Thus, the adoption of “inclusive” education as the new special education policy has resulted in large numbers of deaf youth relying on homesigns as their primary form of communication. This research is based on ethnographic fieldwork with deaf individuals in Iquitos that has been ongoing since 2010.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Gallaudet University Press, 2019. Vol. 19, no 3, p. 348-374
Keywords [en]
Sign-Language; Ideologies
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-44182DOI: 10.1353/sls.2019.0001ISI: 000468623800002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85068138649OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-44182DiVA, id: diva2:1321307
Available from: 2019-06-07 Created: 2019-06-07 Last updated: 2019-08-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Goico, Sara Alida
By organisation
School of Education and Communication
In the same journal
Sign Language Studies
General Language Studies and LinguisticsPedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf