Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring the meaning of coproduction as described by patients after spinal surgery interventions
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ, Dep. of Nursing Science. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. CHILD. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, HHJ. IMPROVE (Improvement, innovation, and leadership in health and welfare).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5123-032x
Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare. Dartmouth Institute, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, USA.
Futurum Academy for Health and Care, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.
Department of Radiology at the Region County of Jönköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Open Nursing Journal, ISSN 1874-4346, E-ISSN 1874-4346, Vol. 13, p. 85-91Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background:

In the procedures of surgical pathways it is important to create opportunities for developing active forms of engagement and extending the patients’ health maintenance knowledge, which is essential in nursing. One way is to understand more about the concept of coproduction.

Objective:

The purpose was to use experiences from spinal surgery patients’ narratives to explore the conceptual model of healthcare service coproduction.

Method:

A prospective qualitative explorative approach was performed and analyzed in two phases with inductive and deductive content analysis of data retrieved from five focus group interviews of 25 patients with experiences from spinal surgery interventions.

Result:

The findings indicate that mutual trust and respect, as well as guidance given in dialogue, are two important domains. An illustration of how to apply the conceptual model of healthcare service coproduction was revealed in the descriptions of the three core concepts co-planning, co-execution and civil discourse.

Conclusion:

This study highlights what is needed to reach coproduction in healthcare services concerning patients with spinal disorders. Development of care plans that focuses on co-planning and co-execution is recommended which are structured and customizable for each patient situation to make coproduction to occur.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bentham Open , 2019. Vol. 13, p. 85-91
Keywords [en]
Coproduction, Focus-group interviews, Healthcare service, Qualitative methods, Spinal surgery, Common spine
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-43419DOI: 10.2174/1874434601913010085Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85067126348Local ID: GOA HHJ 2019;HHJIMPROVEISOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-43419DiVA, id: diva2:1301917
Funder
Futurum - Academy for Health and Care, Jönköping County Council, SwedenAvailable from: 2019-04-03 Created: 2019-04-03 Last updated: 2019-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Petersson, ChristinaBatalden, Paul B.Hedberg, Berith

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Petersson, ChristinaBatalden, Paul B.Hedberg, Berith
By organisation
HHJ, Dep. of Nursing ScienceHHJ. CHILDHHJ. IMPROVE (Improvement, innovation, and leadership in health and welfare)The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Open Nursing Journal
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf