Bone and soft tissue outcomes, risk factors, and complications of implant-supported prostheses: 5-Years RCT with different abutment types and loading protocolsShow others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, ISSN 1523-0899, E-ISSN 1708-8208, Vol. 20, no 3, p. 313-321Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: Data on risk factors and complications after long-term implant treatment is limited. The aims were to evaluate the role of various fixation modes and to analyze complications and risks that affect long-term use of implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses.
Materials and Methods: Fifty partially edentulous subjects received three Brånemark TiUnite™ implants. Superstructures were attached directly at implant level (IL) or via abutments: machined surface (AM) and an oxidized surface (AOX, TiUnite™). Implants were immediately loaded (test) or unloaded for 3 months (control). Examinations occurred over a 5-year period.
Results: Forty-four subjects were re-examined after 5 years. Cumulative survival rates in test and control groups were 93.9% and 97.0%, respectively. Marginal bone loss (MBL; Mean [SEM]) was significantly lower at superstructures connected to AM (1.61 [0.25] mm) than at sites with no abutment IL (2.14 [0.17] mm). Peri-implantitis occurred in 9.1% of subjects and in 4.0% of implants. Multiple linear regression indicated that increased probing pocket depth (PPD), periodontal disease experience, deteriorating health, and light smoking (≤10 cigarettes/day) predict greater MBL, whereas increased buccal soft tissue thickness and higher ISQ predict lower MBL.
Conclusions: The results show that MBL was influenced by the connection type. A machined abutment, instead of connecting the superstructure directly at the implant level, was beneficial. The following factors influenced MBL: PPD, periodontal disease experience, deteriorating health, light smoking, buccal soft tissue thickness, and ISQ. The results on peri-implantitis underscore the need for long-term maintenance care. Further, the abutment material surface properties constitute additional target for strategies to minimize MBL.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2018. Vol. 20, no 3, p. 313-321
Keywords [en]
clinical outcomes, complications, dental abutment, dental implant, marginal bone loss, risk factors, soft tissues, surface properties
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-42718DOI: 10.1111/cid.12587ISI: 000434958400007PubMedID: 29380510Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85048642086OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-42718DiVA, id: diva2:1281923
Funder
Swedish Research Council, K2015-52X-09495-28-4
Note
Cited By :2; Export Date: 23 January 2019; Article; Correspondence Address: Thomsen, P.; Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgSweden; email: peter.thomsen@biomaterials.gu.se; Funding details: ALFGBG-448851; Funding details: Vetenskapsrådet, VR; Funding details: IngaBritt och Arne Lundbergs Forskningsstiftelse; Funding details: Stiftelsen Handlanden Hjalmar Svenssons; Funding text 1: Jo€nko€ping County Council; The Swedish Research Council, Grant/Award Number: K2015-52X-09495-28-4; The BIOMATCELL VINN Excellence Center of Biomaterials and Cell Therapy; The Region Västra Go€taland; The ALF/LUA Research grant, Grant/Award Number: ALFGBG-448851; The Hjalmar Svensson Foundation; The Vilhelm and Martina Lundgren Vetenskapsfond; The IngaBritt and Arne Lundberg Foundation
2019-01-232019-01-232019-09-13Bibliographically approved