Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A framework for strict structured literature reviews within management research and management education: establishing a model for evidence-based management and increased scholarly interaction
Jönköping University, The University Library.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6058-4285
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Over the last decade, the systematic literature review has extended to management research and management education. The purpose of this paper is to present an alternative method named Strict Structured Literature Review (SSLR), to provide a robust selection of articles for starting a longitudinal study or as a fast reliable and transparent method reviewing literature for shorter work under a time-limit, for example research projects or educational assignments. A properly executed Strict Structured Literature Review will lead to the desirable outcome of connecting researchers, or students, with practitioners and create conditions for evidence-based management based on already existing research results. Using a Strict Structured Literature Review would create a publishing strategy where research funders return on investments (ROI) can be met through increased implementation of earlier research results in organizational decision making as well as extended scholarly communication. This is completely in line with the movement towards open science. At the same time, the method for Strict Structured Literature Review fosters a development within management education towards evidence-based management and scholarly interaction.

Keywords [en]
literature reviews, management research, management education, scholarly communication, scholarly cooperation, evidence-based management, knowledge management, university-industry collaboration, open science, systematic literature review, decision making
National Category
Information Studies Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-42691OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-42691DiVA, id: diva2:1281084
Available from: 2019-01-21 Created: 2019-01-21 Last updated: 2019-01-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Fulltext(314 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 314 kBChecksum SHA-512
f2408530800a17f273fc5cf91b521b482427268e9945f9d838d0f533c94996d91da894b27daa66eac212523c2e96aa310ddd67b52f9616e20de506942ec4da4f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Fulltext

Authority records BETA

Gunnarsson, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gunnarsson, Daniel
By organisation
The University Library
Information StudiesBusiness Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 58 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 625 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf