Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Wearable vibrotactile biofeedback device allowing identification of different floor conditions for lower-limb amputees
Interdisciplinary Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Interdisciplinary Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Interdisciplinary Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6507-2329
Interdisciplinary Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0003-9993, E-ISSN 1532-821X, Vol. 97, no 7, p. 1210-1213Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To evaluate a newly developed biofeedback device enabling lower-limb amputees to identify various floor conditions.

Design: Self-control with repeated measures (with and without the biofeedback device) within the amputee group, and group control comparing between amputee and nonamputee groups.

Setting: University locomotion laboratory.

Participants: Five lower-limb amputees and 8 nonamputees (N=13).

Interventions: A wearable biofeedback device, which identified different floor conditions by analyzing the force patterns under the prosthetic feet and provided vibration cues in response to different floor conditions, was provided to the amputees.

Main Outcome Measures: The subjects stepped on a foam platform concealing a small object or no object at 1 of the 4 locations of the foot sole. Subjects were asked whether there was a small object under their feet and the location of the object if it existed. The test was repeated with 4 different object types and 4 object locations. The success rate of floor identification was evaluated.

Results: Without the biofeedback device, nonamputee subjects (76.56%) identified floor conditions better than amputees (22.5%) significantly (P<.001). On using the biofeedback device, the amputees significantly improved (P<.01) their success rate showing no significant difference (P=.746) compared with the nonamputees. No significant differences were found among object types (P=.689).

Conclusions: Amputees performed significantly worse than nonamputees in recognizing the different floor conditions used in this experiment. With the biofeedback device, amputees significantly improved their abilities in identifying different floor conditions. Future attempts could configure the device to allow it to provide warning signals in response to fall-inducing conditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 97, no 7, p. 1210-1213
Keywords [en]
Accidental falls, Amputees, Postural balance, Rehabilitation, Sensation, clinical article, disabled person, feedback system, foam, foot sole, human, leg, locomotion, self control, university, vibration, amputee, case control study, devices, equipment design, female, limb prosthesis, lower limb, male, middle aged, sensory feedback, Artificial Limbs, Case-Control Studies, Feedback, Sensory, Humans, Lower Extremity
National Category
Occupational Therapy Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-42470DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.016ISI: 000378979400021PubMedID: 26763948Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84957895156OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-42470DiVA, id: diva2:1276525
Available from: 2019-01-08 Created: 2019-01-08 Last updated: 2019-02-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Ma, Christina Zong-Hao

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ma, Christina Zong-Hao
In the same journal
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Occupational TherapyOrthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf